Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111183›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A mechanistic model of methane emission from animal slurry with a focus on microbial groups.

Frederik R Dalby, Sasha D Hafner, Søren O Petersen, Andrew Vanderzaag, Jemaneh Habtewold, Kari Dunfield, Martin H Chantigny, Sven G Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frederik R DalbyDepartment of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2437-064X
Sasha D HafnerDepartment of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0955-0327
Søren O PetersenDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Andrew VanderzaagOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Jemaneh HabtewoldOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Kari DunfieldSchool of Environmental Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Martin H ChantignyQuebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, Canada.
Sven G SommerDepartment of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2673-0162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid manure (slurry) from livestock releases methane (CH4) that contributes significantly to global warming. Existing models for slurry CH4 production-used for mitigation and inventories-include effects of organic matter loading, temperature, and retention time but cannot predict important effects of management, or adequately capture essential temperature-driven dynamics. Here we present a new model that includes multiple methanogenic groups whose relative abundance shifts in response to changes in temperature or other environmental conditions. By default, the temperature responses of five groups correspond to those of four methanogenic species and one uncultured methanogen, although any number of groups could be defined. We argue that this simple mechanistic approach is able to describe both short- and long-term responses to temperature where other existing approaches fall short. The model is available in the open-source R package ABM (https://github.com/sashahafner/ABM) as a single flexible function that can include effects of slurry management (e.g., removal frequency and treatment methods) and changes in environmental conditions over time. Model simulations suggest that the reduction of CH4 emission by frequent emptying of slurry pits is due to washout of active methanogens. Application of the model to represent a full-scale slurry storage tank showed it can reproduce important trends, including a delayed response to temperature changes. However, the magnitude of predicted emission is uncertain, primarily as a result of sensitivity to the hydrolysis rate constant, due to a wide range in reported values. Results indicated that with additional work-particularly on the magnitude of hydrolysis rate-the model could be a tool for estimation of CH4 emissions for inventories.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringGlobal WarmingLivestockManureMethaneModels, BiologicalWaste Disposal, FluidManureMethane

Identifiers

PMID34111183
PMCPMC8191904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.