Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111134›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): An umbrella review.

Elodie Besnier, Katie Thomson, Donata Stonkute, Talal Mohammad, Nasima Akhter, Adam Todd, Magnus Rom Jensen, Astrid Kilvik, Clare Bambra

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines.Communications medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elodie BesnierDepartment of Sociology and Political Science, Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-7455
Katie ThomsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Donata StonkuteCHAIN, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Talal MohammadCHAIN, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Nasima AkhterDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Adam ToddSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Magnus Rom JensenLibrary Section for Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-2676
Astrid KilvikMedicine and Health Library, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Clare BambraPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
NTNU Samfunnsforskning · NONewcastle University · GBDurham University · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant progress in the last few decades, infectious diseases remain a major threat to child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)-particularly amongst more disadvantaged groups. It is imperative to understand the best available evidence concerning which public health interventions reduce morbidity, mortality and health inequalities in children aged under five years. To address this gap, we carried out an umbrella review (a systematic reviews of reviews) to identify evidence on the effects of public health interventions (promotion, protection, prevention) on morbidity, mortality and/or health inequalities due to infectious diseases amongst children in LMICs. Ten databases were searched for records published between 2014-2021 alongside a manual search of gray literature. Articles were quality-assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR 2). A narrative synthesis was conducted. We identified 60 systematic reviews synthesizing 453 individual primary studies. A majority of the reviews reported on preventive interventions (n = 48), with a minority on promotion (n = 17) and almost no reviews covering health protection interventions (n = 2). Effective interventions for improving child health across the whole population, as well as the most disadvantaged included communication, education and social mobilization for specific preventive services or tools, such as immunization or bed nets. For all other interventions, the effects were either unclear, unknown or detrimental, either at the overall population level or regarding health inequalities. We found few reviews reporting health inequalities information and the quality of the evidence base was generally low. Our umbrella review identified some prevention interventions that might be useful in reducing under five mortality from infectious diseases in LMICs, particularly amongst the most disadvantaged groups.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesDeveloping CountriesChildChild, PreschoolHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantMorbidityPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID34111134
PMCPMC8191901
OpenAlexW3167330966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.