Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110652›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2022

Executive function as measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2: children and adolescents with Williams syndrome.

C Greiner de Magalhães, C H Pitts, C B Mervis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Executive function and intellectual disability: innovations, methods and treatment.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C Greiner de MagalhãesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-1770
C H PittsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-0014
C B MervisDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-6115

Funding

GENOTYPE/PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS IN WILLIAMS SYNDROMER01NS035102 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MERVIS, CAROLYN B. · 1996 to 2009
$12.5M
Early Development with Williams or Down SyndromeR37HD029957 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MERVIS, CAROLYN B. · 2004 to 2013
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD029957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifficulties with executive functions (EF) are very common among individuals with Williams syndrome (WS). To characterise the pattern of relative strengths and weaknesses in EF for children and adolescents with WS, we considered the performance of a large sample on the parent version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF-2). Associations between distinct components of EF and adaptive behaviour, behaviour problems and intellectual ability were investigated. The concurrent effects of components of behaviour regulation and emotion regulation on attention problems and anxiety problems also were evaluated.

methodsParticipants were 308 6-17-year-olds with genetically confirmed classic WS deletions. Parent report of EF was measured by the BRIEF-2 questionnaire. Most participants (223/308) completed the Differential Ability Scales-II as a measure of intellectual ability. The parents of these individuals also completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the interview form of the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised.

resultsAs a group, the participants evidenced considerable parent-reported EF difficulty. A profile of relative strength and weakness was found at the index level, with performance on both the Behavior Regulation Index and the Emotion Regulation Index significantly better than performance on the Cognitive Regulation Index. Within each index, a statistically significant pattern of relative strength and weakness also was identified. Difficulties with behaviour regulation and emotion regulation were related to both behaviour problems and adaptive behaviour limitations. Higher inflexibility and more difficulty with self-monitoring were associated with lower overall intellectual ability. Difficulty with inhibition was uniquely associated with attention problems, and inflexibility was uniquely associated with anxiety problems.

conclusionsExecutive function difficulties are highly prevalent among children and adolescents with WS and are associated with adaptive behaviour limitations, both internalising and externalising behaviour problems and more limited intellectual ability. These results highlight the importance of designing and delivering research-based interventions to improve the EF of children and adolescents with WS.

Indexed as

Problem BehaviorWilliams SyndromeAdolescentChildCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansInhibition, Psychologicaladaptive behaviourattention deficit/hyperactivityBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)executive functionintellectual disabilityWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34110652
PMCPMC8660954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.