ArticleMolecular biology reports2021
The roles of Cdc42 and Rac1 in the formation of plasma membrane protrusions in cancer epithelial HeLa cells.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pleiotropic physiological functions of Piezo1 in human body and its effect on malignant behavior of tumors.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The inducible model of clones generated from the cervical cancer epithelial HeLa cell line has shown the role of DOCK10 as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for Rho GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 and as an inducer of filopodia and plasma membrane (PM) ruffles. In this model, constitutively active (CA) mutants of Cdc42 and Rac1 promote filopodia and ruffles, respectively, as in other models. DOCK9 also induces filopodia and ruffles, although ruffling activity is less prominent. By exploiting this model further, the aim of this work is to provide a more complete understanding of the role of Cdc42 and Rac1, and their interactions with DOCK10 and DOCK9, in regulation of PM protrusions. New clones have been generated from HeLa, including single clones expressing one form of wild-type (WT) or dominant negative (DN) Cdc42 or Rac1, and double clones co-expressing one of them together with either DOCK10 or DOCK9. Expression of WT- and DN-Cdc42 induced filopodia. WT-Cdc42 and, especially, DN-Cdc42 also gave rise to veil protrusions, which were neutralized by DOCK10. Moreover, DN-Cdc42 stimulated the emergence of ruffles, further increased by DOCK10, and WT-Cdc42 also augmented ruffles in presence of DOCK9 and DOCK10. WT-Rac1 greatly increased PM blebbing, as did DN-Rac1 more moderately. In both cases, blebs were enhanced by DOCK10. DN-Rac1 and CA-Rac1 moderately raised filopodia, and DOCK10 and DOCK9 had opposed effects on filopodia (up and down, respectively) in presence of WT-Rac1. As conclusions, we highlight that Cdc42 promotes filopodia regardless of its conformational state, and Rac1 induces blebs in conformations other than CA, especially WT-Rac1, in the inducible HeLa clones. The model could be useful to learn more about the mechanisms underlying PM protrusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.