Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110549›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2021

Managing admission and discharge processes in intensive care units.

Jie Bai, Andreas Fügener, Jochen Gönsch, Jens O Brunner, Manfred Blobner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie BaiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 29, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Andreas FügenerFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Cologne, Germany.
Jochen GönschMercator School of Management, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße 65, 47057, Duisburg, Germany.
Jens O BrunnerFaculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany. jens.brunner@uni-a.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-4795
Manfred BlobnerClinics for Anaesthesiology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the most crucial and expensive resources in a health care system. While high fixed costs usually lead to tight capacities, shortages have severe consequences. Thus, various challenging issues exist: When should an ICU admit or reject arriving patients in general? Should ICUs always be able to admit critical patients or rather focus on high utilization? On an operational level, both admission control of arriving patients and demand-driven early discharge of currently residing patients are decision variables and should be considered simultaneously. This paper discusses the trade-off between medical and monetary goals when managing intensive care units by modeling the problem as a Markov decision process. Intuitive, myopic rule mimicking decision-making in practice is applied as a benchmark. In a numerical study based on real-world data, we demonstrate that the medical results deteriorate dramatically when focusing on monetary goals only, and vice versa. Using our model, we illustrate the trade-off along an efficiency frontier that accounts for all combinations of medical and monetary goals. Coming from a solution that optimizes monetary costs, a significant reduction of expected mortality can be achieved at little additional monetary cost.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient DischargeHumansIntensive Care UnitsPatient AdmissionAdmission and discharge decisionsDynamic programmingIntensive care unitMarkov decision processOperations research

Identifiers

PMID34110549
PMCPMC8189840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.