Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110426›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Longitudinal reproducibility of attenuation measurements on virtual unenhanced images: multivendor dual-energy CT evaluation.

Simon Lennartz, Anushri Parakh, Jinjin Cao, Avinash Kambadakone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Simon LennartzDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA.
Anushri ParakhDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA.
Jinjin CaoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA.
Avinash KambadakoneDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA. akambadakone@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6714-9190
Harvard University · US

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft LE 4401/1-1 (Project number 426969820)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe accuracy of virtual unenhanced (VUE) images has been extensively investigated, yet data on their longitudinal reproducibility is limited. The study purpose was to evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility of VUE attenuation measurements on three different dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner types.

methodsA total of 137 patients with repeated abdominal DECT either on a rapid kV switching (rsDECT; n = 46), a dual-layer detector (dlDECT; n = 43), or a dual-source scanner (dsDECT; n = 48) were retrospectively included. Attenuation was measured on VUE and corresponding contrast-enhanced images in the liver, spleen, kidneys, aorta, portal vein, and fat. Longitudinal reproducibility was evaluated by calculating the absolute inter-scan differences (HU) and the inter-scan variation (%). Measurement pairs with differences ≤ 10 HU were considered reproducible. Influence of contrast-enhanced attenuation on VUE reproducibility was analyzed using linear regression.

resultsThe scanner-specific cohorts showed similar age (p-range: 0.35-0.99), sex (p-range: 0.68-1), body weight (p-range: 0.26-0.87), body diameter (p-range: 0.34-0.76), and inter-scan time (p-range: 0.52-0.83). In total, 94.9% of VUE measurements were reproducible for rsDECT, 93.8% for dlDECT, and 90.6% for dsDECT. Overall inter-scan variation was lowest in fat (4.0 (1.7-8.2)%) and highest in tissues with high contrast enhancement: the aorta (13.3 (4.6-21.3)%), portal vein (10.8 (5.7-19.8)%), and kidneys (10.7 (3.9-18.0)%). Significant differences in inter-scan variation were found between the scanner types for the aorta, portal vein, kidneys, and spleen. Inter-scan differences in contrast-enhanced attenuation significantly influenced inter-scan differences in VUE attenuation (p < 0.001; t-ratio: 4.34).

conclusionsLongitudinal reproducibility of VUE attenuation was high for all scanners, yet inter-scan variation of VUE attenuation was influenced by contrast enhancement, showing greatest magnitude and discrepancy between scanner types in vessels and the kidneys. KEY POINTS: • We found that 94.9% of attenuation measurements on virtual unenhanced images were reproducible for rapid kV switching DECT, 93.8% for dual-layer detector DECT, and 90.6% for dual-source DECT. • Inter-scan variation of attenuation in virtual unenhanced images was comparable between the three scanner types in the liver and fat, whereas inter-scan variation in the spleen, kidneys, portal vein, and aorta showed significant differences between scanner types (p < 0.05). • Inter-scan attenuation differences in contrast-enhanced images significantly influenced inter-scan differences in virtual unenhanced attenuation (p < 0.001, t-ratio: 4.34), suggesting a residual impact of contrast enhancement differences between examinations.

Indexed as

Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionContrast MediaHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaContrast mediaReproducibility of resultsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID34110426
OpenAlexW3168759525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.