Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110385›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Classifying Retinal Degeneration in Histological Sections Using Deep Learning.

Daniel Al Mouiee, Erik Meijering, Michael Kalloniatis, Lisa Nivison-Smith, Richard A Williams, David A X Nayagam, Thomas C Spencer, Chi D Luu, Ceara McGowan, Stephanie B Epp and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Detection of blood stains using computer vision-based algorithms and their association with postoperative outcomes in thoracoscopic lobectomies.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Al MouieeGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Erik MeijeringGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Michael KalloniatisSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Lisa Nivison-SmithSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Richard A WilliamsDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David A X NayagamDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Thomas C SpencerThe Bionics Institute of Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chi D LuuOphthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Ceara McGowanThe Bionics Institute of Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephanie B EppThe Bionics Institute of Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mohit N ShivdasaniGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Bionics Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are increasingly being used to classify retinal diseases. In this study we investigated the ability of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in categorizing histological images into different classes of retinal degeneration. Methods: Images were obtained from a chemically induced feline model of monocular retinal dystrophy and split into training and testing sets. The training set was graded for the level of retinal degeneration and used to train various CNN architectures. The testing set was evaluated through the best architecture and graded by six observers. Comparisons between model and observer classifications, and interobserver variability were measured. Finally, the effects of using less training images or images containing half the presentable context were investigated. Results: The best model gave weighted-F1 scores in the range 85% to 90%. Cohen kappa scores reached up to 0.86, indicating high agreement between the model and observers. Interobserver variability was consistent with the model-observer variability in the model's ability to match predictions with the observers. Image context restriction resulted in model performance reduction by up to 6% and at least one training set size resulted in a model performance reduction of 10% compared to the original size. Conclusions: Detecting the presence and severity of up to three classes of retinal degeneration in histological data can be reliably achieved with a deep learning classifier. Translational Relevance: This work lays the foundations for future AI models which could aid in the evaluation of more intricate changes occurring in retinal degeneration, particularly in other types of clinically derived image data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinal DegenerationAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCatsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34110385
PMCPMC8196406
OpenAlexW3168020354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.