Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110301›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Using Co-design to Explore How Midwives Can Support the Emerging Mother-Infant Relationship During the Early Postnatal Period: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Cathy Stoodley, Lois McKellar, Tahereh Ziaian, Mary Steen, Ian Gwilt, Jenny Fereday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The process of co-designing a model of social prescribing: An Australian case study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathy Stoodley *UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, City East Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-2395
Lois McKellarUniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, City East Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7490-2478
Tahereh ZiaianUniSA: Justice & Society, Magill Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-2405
Mary SteenUniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, City East Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-5693
Ian GwiltUniSA: Creative, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-3423
Jenny FeredayWomen's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-9599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe postnatal period can be a challenging time for women, with mothers experiencing a range of emotions. As a woman transitions to motherhood, she adjusts to a new sense of self and forms a new relationship with her infant. Becoming a mother is a complex cognitive and social process that is unique for each woman and is influenced and shaped by culture. The emerging mother-infant relationship is a significant factor in maternal well-being and infant development, with the bond between the mother and her baby being critical to the development of secure attachment. It has been recognized that the strength of this relationship is the main predictor of how well a child will do throughout life. There has been a global focus on the importance of the first 1000 days, with Australia identifying this as a national priority. Midwives are ideally placed to support mothers during the development of the mother-infant relationship, providing care through the early postnatal period, which has been identified as a sensitive period for the development of the mother-infant relationship.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore how midwives can support the emerging mother-infant relationship in the context of cultural diversity and develop an appropriate co-designed intervention in the early postnatal period.

methodsThis study will use a mixed method approach, specifically the exploratory sequential design (intervention development variant). This study will be undertaken in 3 phases: 1 qualitative phase, which is followed by 2 quantitative phases. Phase 1 will include a scoping review to explore interventions that have influenced the development of the mother-infant relationship, and then, interviews will be undertaken with women exploring their early experiences of motherhood, followed by 3 co-design workshops. The workshops will engage with multilevel stakeholder representatives where, through partnership and participation, they will propose and develop an intervention to support the emerging mother-infant relationship. Phase 2 will develop and pilot 2 purpose-designed evaluation surveys to evaluate the co-designed intervention from the perspective of both mothers and midwives. Phase 3 will implement and evaluate the co-designed intervention using pre- and postmeasures and feedback from the purpose-designed surveys.

resultsPhase 1 has commenced and is expected to be completed by August 2021. Phase 2 is expected to be completed by September 2021, with phase 3 commencing in October 2021. The study will be completed by March 2023.

conclusionsThe results of this study will be shared with a variety of audiences and will contribute to the body of knowledge on the mother-infant relationship, potentially improving the understanding of this relationship for women and midwives. This may result in improved strategies for care, with mothers benefiting from enhanced experience and satisfaction during the early postnatal period.

Indexed as

co-designearly postnatalinfant developmentmidwifemixed methodsmother-infant bondingmother-infant relationsmother-infant relationship

Identifiers

PMID34110301
PMCPMC8241434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.