Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34110074›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Proactive inhibition is not modified by deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: An electrical neuroimaging study.

Michael De Pretto, Michael Mouthon, Ines Debove, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schüpbach, Lucas Spierer, Ettore A Accolla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael De PrettoNeurology Unit, Medicine Section, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4176-4798
Michael MouthonNeurology Unit, Medicine Section, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-4102
Ines DeboveMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-2963
Claudio PolloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael SchüpbachMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-3359
Lucas SpiererNeurology Unit, Medicine Section, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3558-4408
Ettore A AccollaNeurology Unit, Medicine Section, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1234-8808
University of Fribourg · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In predictable contexts, motor inhibitory control can be deployed before the actual need for response suppression. The brain functional underpinnings of proactive inhibition, and notably the role of basal ganglia, are not entirely identified. We investigated the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or internal globus pallidus on proactive inhibition in patients with Parkinson's disease. They completed a cued go/no-go proactive inhibition task ON and (unilateral) OFF stimulation while EEG was recorded. We found no behavioural effect of either subthalamic nucleus or internal globus pallidus deep brain stimulation on proactive inhibition, despite a general improvement of motor performance with subthalamic nucleus stimulation. In the non-operated and subthalamic nucleus group, we identified periods of topographic EEG modulation by the level of proactive inhibition. In the subthalamic nucleus group, source estimation analysis suggested the initial involvement of bilateral frontal and occipital areas, followed by a right lateralized fronto-basal network, and finally of right premotor and left parietal regions. Our results confirm the overall preservation of proactive inhibition capacities in both subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus deep brain stimulation, and suggest a partly segregated network for proactive inhibition, with a preferential recruitment of the indirect pathway.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationElectroencephalographyProactive InhibitionAgedFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetParkinson DiseasePsychomotor PerformanceSubthalamic NucleusEEGindirect pathwayinhibitory controlinternal globus pallidussubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID34110074
PMCPMC8288097
OpenAlexW3167516673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.