Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109741›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2021

Expansion of Spinal Canal with Lift-Open Laminoplasty: A New Method for Compression Cervical Myelopathy.

Huan Wang, Lei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lamina Abrasion Caused by High-Speed Drill in Unilateral Door Cervical Laminoplasty: A Clinical Investigation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huan WangSpinal Surgery Unit, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-2283
Lei ZhangSpinal Surgery Unit, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study is to introduce lift-open laminoplasty and verify the increase of the spinal canal area following this surgical technique according to the preoperative anatomical measurement.

methodsThere are 82 patients (43 male and 39 female) analyzed in our study from January 2019 to December 2020. The average age was 63.2 ± 3.21 years (from 41 to 84 years). All of them were treated with open-door laminoplasty, with a decompression segment range from C3 to C6. The increase of the spinal canal area after open-door laminoplasty was measured on postoperative CT images of the patients, and the distances between both lamina-facet junctions and lamina length was measured on preoperative CT images. Using the Pythagorean theorem for the equation of calculation area after the expansile open-door laminoplasty. Based on previous measurement parameters, spinous process length, lateral mass width, distance between osteotomy line and lamina-facet junctions line were additionally measured on preoperative CT images. Pythagorean theorem was used for calculating the area after the expansile lift-open laminoplasty. The results were recorded and a statistical analysis was undertaken. Then, there were six patients (five male and one female) treated with lift-open laminoplasty on C6, open-door on C3-C5, who suffer from cervical spondylotic myelopathy from December 2020 to January 2021. The average age was 60.3 ± 1.7 years (from 56 to 71 years). Operation time, blood loss, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score recovery rate were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed.

resultsThe increase of the spinal canal area after open-door laminoplasty measured on postoperative CT images was 123.01 ± 17.06 mm

conclusionLift-open laminoplasty could preserve nearly 100% of extensor muscle, avoid damaging C7 paraspinal muscles and C6-7 posterior muscle-ligament complex, reconstruct the spinous process firmly in the midline, and expand adequate spinal canal area after operation. These advantages could reduce the incidence rate of complications and bring better clinical results than traditional laminoplasty.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansLaminoplastyMaleMiddle AgedSpinal CanalSpinal Cord DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAxial symptomsExtensor musclesLift-open laminoplastyOpen-door laminoplastySpinal canal area

Identifiers

PMID34109741
PMCPMC8313177
OpenAlexW3168020315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.