ArticleThe patient2022
Identifying New Zealand Public Preferences for Pharmacist Prescribers in Primary Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Article in The patient, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.The patient · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Patient preferences for community pharmacy service models in diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveGiven increasing patient populations, general practitioner workforce constraints and the growing demand for health services in New Zealand (NZ), the development and provision of pharmacist prescribing services could be used to improve people's access to medicines. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was utilised to determine NZ public preferences for pharmacist prescribing services in primary care in NZ.
methodsA D-efficient DCE design generated 20 choice questions in four blocks of five questions with three labelled alternatives per choice question. The online DCE used a NZ general public online research panel administered by an external organisation (SurveyEngine). The DCE included six attributes with two attributes each with two levels (location of consultation and consultation type), three levels (type of service and operating hours) and four levels (waiting time and cost).
resultsNine hundred and twenty-four respondents completed the survey with 4620 observations available for analyses. Respondents preferred pharmacist prescribing services with the following characteristics: optimisation of medicines and changes to only current medicine service types (relative to repeat prescribing); lower consultation costs, shorter waiting times, longer operating hours and consultation by appointment (relative to walk-in and wait clinic).
conclusionsPrescribing policy could incorporate these public preferences to help develop accessible and effective primary care prescribing services utilising the skills of pharmacist prescribers to improve and reduce inequities in access to medicines in NZ. These results suggest the NZ public see pharmacists as part of the primary care prescribing team and are willing to utilise them if these services are implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34109570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.