Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109492›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2021

Communities of Practice in Acute and Forensic Psychiatry: Lessons Learned and Perceived Effects.

Sylvia Gerritsen, Anne Laura Van Melle, Lieke Johanna Cornelia Zomer, Guy Antoine Marie Widdershoven, Yolande Voskes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sylvia GerritsenDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University F-Wing, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands. s.gerritsen1@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-2423
Anne Laura Van MelleDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University F-Wing, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-1354
Lieke Johanna Cornelia ZomerDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University F-Wing, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-2299
Guy Antoine Marie WiddershovenDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University F-Wing, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-6812
Yolande VoskesDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University F-Wing, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0211-8892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Netherlands, two new approaches have been developed for acute and forensic psychiatry, called High and Intensive Care (HIC) and Forensic High and Intensive Care (FHIC). The models provide standards for temporary high-quality clinical care for patients in crisis and combine practices to reduce seclusion. To support the implementation of these approaches, Communities of Practice (CoPs) were created, including peer providers, mental health nurses, psychiatrists and managers. CoPs are increasingly used in healthcare. However, CoPs vary greatly in form and objective, and more insight is needed in the organisation and facilitation of CoPs. Therefore, the aim of this study is to gain insight into the lessons learned and perceived effects of the CoPs. A qualitative approach was used. Data were collected through focus groups (n = 3) with participants in the CoPs, feedback meetings with teams implementing HIC (n = 78) or FHIC (n = 23), and observations by the researchers. Data were analysed thematically. Lessons learned are: 1) create an ambassador role for CoP participants, 2) organize concrete activities, 3) take care of a multidisciplinary composition, and 4) foster shared responsibility and work on sustainability. Perceived effects of the CoPs were: 1) support of HIC and FHIC implementation, 2) creation of a national movement, and 3) further development of the HIC and FHIC approaches. The audits served as an important vehicle to activate the CoPs, and stimulated the implementation of HIC and FHIC. The findings may help others in creating a CoP when it comes to the implementation of best practices and improving healthcare.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesForensic PsychiatryDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHumansQuality of Health CareAuditForensic Mental HealthInterprofessional PracticeMental Health CarePractice DevelopmentQuality of Care

Identifiers

PMID34109492
PMCPMC8531102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.