Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109474›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2022

Long-term, multidomain analyses to identify the breed and allelic effects in MSTN-edited pigs to overcome lameness and sustainably improve nutritional meat production.

Ziyao Fan, Zhiguo Liu, Kui Xu, Tianwen Wu, Jinxue Ruan, Xinmin Zheng, Shideng Bao, Yulian Mu, Tad Sonstegard, Kui Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Integrative Adipogenic Engineering of Cultured Fat for Cell Based Meat.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  5. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CRISPR-Cas9 in the Tailoring of Genetically Engineered Animals.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. AeLife · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ziyao Fan *State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhiguo Liu *State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Kui Xu *State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Tianwen WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jinxue RuanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xinmin ZhengHubei Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering and Molecular Breeding, Hubei Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, 430064, China.
Shideng BaoDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Yulian MuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. mouyulian@caas.cn.
Tad SonstegardAcceligen Inc., Eagan, MN, 55121, USA. tad@acceligen.com.
Kui LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. likui@caas.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Animal Sciences · CNCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USHubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beef and mutton production has been aided by breeding to integrate allelic diversity for myostatin (MSTN), but a lack of diversity in the MSTN germplasm has limited similar advances in pig farming. Moreover, insurmountable challenges with congenital lameness and a dearth of data about the impacts of feed conversion, reproduction, and meat quality in MSTN-edited pigs have also currently blocked progress. Here, in a largest-to-date evaluation of multiple MSTN-edited pig populations, we demonstrated a practical alternative edit-site-based solution that overcomes the major production obstacle of hindlimb weakness. We also provide long-term and multidomain datasets for multiple breeds that illustrate how MSTN-editing can sustainably increase the yields of breed-specific lean meat and the levels of desirable lipids without deleteriously affecting feed-conversion rates or litter size. Apart from establishing a new benchmark for the data scale and quality of genome-edited animal production, our study specifically illustrates how gene-editing site selection profoundly impacts the phenotypic outcomes in diverse genetic backgrounds.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedEnergy MetabolismGene EditingHindlimbLameness, AnimalMyostatinPork MeatSpecies SpecificitySwineSwine DiseasesThermogenesisMyostatinediting strategygenetic backgroundMSTN-edited pigsmultidomain evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34109474
PMCPMC8188954
OpenAlexW3166616504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.