Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109451›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2021

Consuming Different Structural Parts of Bamboo Induce Gut Microbiome Changes in Captive Giant Pandas.

Zheng Yan, Qin Xu, Walter H Hsu, Stephan Schmitz Esser, James Ayala, Rong Hou, Ying Yao, Dandan Jiang, Shibin Yuan, Hairui Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Virome in Fecal Samples From Wild Giant Pandas (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zheng Yan *Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Qin Xu *Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Walter H HsuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Stephan Schmitz EsserDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
James AyalaChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Rong HouChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Ying YaoChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Dandan JiangChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Shibin YuanKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation of Ministry of Education, Nanchong, 637009, China. yshibin@sina.com.
Hairui WangChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610081, China. pandaharry@panda.org.cn.
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding · CNIowa State University · US

Funding

Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation CPF2017-10Funds for Creative Research Groups of Sichuan Provincial Education Department 17TD0037National Key Research Development Program 2017YFD0501701National Natural Science Foundation of China 31470462Talent Foundation Project of China West Normal University 17YC357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant pandas consume different structural parts of bamboo (shoots, leaves and culms) during different seasons. Previous research showed different bamboo parts have varying nutritional content and that a long-term diet consisting of a single part of bamboo resulted in remarkable metabolic changes within captive giant pandas. However, the effects on the gut microbiome of giant pandas, as a result of a single bamboo part diet, have not been investigated. Here, we evaluated the changes in gut microbial communities based on single bamboo part diets and their potential implications by using 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing and metagenome shotgun sequencing. We found that the composition and function of the gut microbiome from captive giant pandas fed exclusively culms were significantly different from that of individuals fed shoots or leaves. During the culm feeding period, the gut microbiome showed strongest digestive capabilities for cellulose, hemicellulose and starch, and had the highest potential abilities for the biosynthesis of bile acids, fatty acids and amino acids. This suggests the microbiome aids in breaking down culm, which is more difficult for giant pandas to digest, as a means to compensate for the nutrient poor content of the culm. Genes related to fatty acid metabolism and tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes were more abundant during the leaf stage diet than that in the shoot and culm stages. Thus, the microbiome may help giant pandas, which typically have low lipase levels, with fat digestion. These results illustrate that adaptive changes in the gut microbiome community and function may be an important mechanism to aid giant panda digestion when consuming different structural parts of bamboo.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeUrsidaeAnimalsDietMetagenomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34109451
PMCPMC8289812
OpenAlexW3171270477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.