ArticleMolecular medicine reports2021
Effects of miR‑210‑3p on the erythroid differentiation of K562 cells under hypoxia.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bioinformatics study.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Identifying causal genetic variants for high-altitude adaptation through blood eQTL analysis in plateau populations.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Stochastic Modeling of Biophysical Responses to Perturbation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- CEMIG: prediction of the cis-regulatory motif using the de Bruijn graph from ATAC-seq.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Post-transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GATA binding protein 1 (GATA‑1) is one of the most important hematopoietic transcription factors in the production of blood cells, such as platelets, eosinophils, mast cells and erythrocytes. GATA‑1 regulates the participation of microRNA (miRNAs/miRs) in erythroid differentiation under normoxia. However, GATA‑1 expression and the regulation of miR‑210‑3p in the context of erythroid differentiation under hypoxia remain unknown. The present study examined the expression levels of GATA‑1 and miR‑210‑3p in the model of erythroid differentiation in K562 cells under hypoxia, and determined the effects of GATA‑1, miR‑210‑3p and SMAD2 on erythroid differentiation through lentivirus transfection experiments. The present study detected increased GATA‑1 expression under hypoxia. Moreover, miR‑210‑3p was identified as a positive regulator of erythroid differentiation, which was upregulated both during erythroid differentiation and in GATA‑1 overexpression experiments under hypoxia. Importantly, in the K562 cell model of erythroid differentiation under hypoxia, miR‑210‑3p was upregulated in a GATA‑1‑dependent manner. Using a double luciferase reporter assay, miR‑210‑3p was identified as a downstream target of GATA‑1‑mediated regulation of erythropoiesis. Gain‑ or loss‑of‑function analysis of miR‑210‑3p identified its importance in erythroid differentiation. Furthermore, it was found that SMAD2 may be a downstream target gene for miR‑210‑3p. Bioinformatics predictions suggested that SMAD2 mediated miR‑210‑3p‑induced regulation of erythroid differentiation. Collectively, the present study provides novel insights into the miRNA regulation of erythroid differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.