Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109325›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2020

Interpretable Deep Models for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response Prediction.

Esther Puyol-Antón, Chen Chen, James R Clough, Bram Ruijsink, Baldeep S Sidhu, Justin Gould, Bradley Porter, Marc Elliott, Vishal Mehta, Daniel Rueckert and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 3D cardiac shape analysis with variational point cloud autoencoders for myocardial infarction prediction and virtual heart synthesis.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Role of AI in Characterizing the DCM Phenotype.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Esther Puyol-AntónSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Chen ChenBioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
James R CloughSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Bram RuijsinkSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Baldeep S SidhuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Justin GouldSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Bradley PorterSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Marc ElliottSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Vishal MehtaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Daniel RueckertBioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher A RinaldiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew P KingSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in deep learning (DL) have resulted in impressive accuracy in some medical image classification tasks, but often deep models lack interpretability. The ability of these models to explain their decisions is important for fostering clinical trust and facilitating clinical translation. Furthermore, for many problems in medicine there is a wealth of existing clinical knowledge to draw upon, which may be useful in generating explanations, but it is not obvious how this knowledge can be encoded into DL models - most models are learnt either from scratch or using transfer learning from a different domain. In this paper we address both of these issues. We propose a novel DL framework for image-based classification based on a variational autoencoder (VAE). The framework allows prediction of the output of interest from the latent space of the autoencoder, as well as visualisation (in the image domain) of the effects of crossing the decision boundary, thus enhancing the interpretability of the classifier. Our key contribution is that the VAE disentangles the latent space based on 'explanations' drawn from existing clinical knowledge. The framework can predict outputs as well as explanations for these outputs, and also raises the possibility of discovering new biomarkers that are separate (or disentangled) from the existing knowledge. We demonstrate our framework on the problem of predicting response of patients with cardiomyopathy to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) from cine cardiac magnetic resonance images. The sensitivity and specificity of the proposed model on the task of CRT response prediction are 88.43% and 84.39% respectively, and we showcase the potential of our model in enhancing understanding of the factors contributing to CRT response.

Indexed as

Cardiac MRICardiac resynchronization therapyInterpretable MLVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID34109325
PMCPMC7610934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.