ArticleMaterialia2021
Bioresorbable Stent to Manage Congenital Heart Defects in Children.
Article in Materialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Functional Vascular Stents for Cardiovascular Therapy with Drug Delivery and Computational Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Integrating stent design and microstructural characterization to improve clinical outcomes of bioresorbable stents.Materials & design · 2025Article
- Absorbable metal stents for vascular use in pediatric cardiology: progress and outlook.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Bioabsorbable Polymeric Stent for the Treatment of Coarctation of the Aorta (CoA) in Children: A Methodology to Evaluate the Design and Mechanical Properties of PLA Polymer.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intravascular stents for pediatric patients that degrade without inhibiting vessel growth remain a clinical challenge. Here, poly(L-lactide) fibers (DH-BDS) at two thicknesses, 250 μm and 300 μm, were assembled into large, pediatric-sized stents (Ø10 - Ø20 mm). Fibers were characterized mechanically and thermally, then stent mechanical properties were compared to metal controls, while mass loss and degradation kinetics modeling estimated total stent degradation time. Thicker fibers displayed lower stiffness (1969 ± 44 vs 2126 ± 37 MPa) and yield stress (117 ± 12 vs 137 ± 5 MPa) than thinner counterparts, but exhibited similar fail strength (478 ± 28 vs 476 ± 16 MPa) at higher strains (47 ± 2 vs 44 ± 2%). Stents all exhibited crystallinity between 51.3 - 54.4% and fiber glass transition temperatures of 88.6 ± 0.5 °C and 84.6 ± 0.5 °C were well above physiological ranges. Radial strength (0.31 ± 0.01 - 0.34 ± 0.02 N/mm) in thinner stents was similar to metal stents (0.24 - 0.41 N/mm) up to Ø14 mm with no foreshortening and thicker coils granted comparable radial strength (0.32 ± 0.02 - 0.34 ± 0.02 N/mm) in stents larger than Ø14 mm. Both 10 mm (1.17 ± 0.02 % and 0.86 ± 0.1 %) and 12 mm (1.1 ± 0.03% and 0.89 ± 0.1%) stents exhibited minimal weight loss over one year. Degradation kinetics models predicted full stent degradation within 2.8 - 4.5 years depending on thickness. DH-BDS exhibiting hoop strength similar to metal stents and demonstrating minimal degradation and strength loss over the first year before completely disappearing within 3 to 4.5 years show promise as a pediatric interventional alternative to current strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.