ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Chronic Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Treated at a Major Tertiary Eye Hospital Within the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review of Ophthalmic Management and Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Ophthalmic Sequelae of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis at a Tertiary Eyecare Centre in Hungary.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Acute and chronic ocular outcomes in SJS/TEN patients treated with oral ciclosporin vs intravenous immunoglobulin.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Marsupialization of conjunctival inclusion cyst in Stevens-Johnson syndrome.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the clinical characteristics in chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) patients within the United Kingdom population, their causative factors, treatment profile and prognosis. This retrospective series included 91 patients with chronic SJS treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital (London, United Kingdom). A chart review included visual acuity and presence of clinical findings (including lid abnormalities and ocular surface findings). All medical and surgical treatments were also recorded. Approximately a half of patients were White British but there were significant numbers of patients from other ethnic groups, South Asian and Black in particular. Oral antibiotics were the causative agent in almost a half of the patients with SJS, systemic infections in 14%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 8% and anticonvulsants in 7%. The age of onset was varied but a significant proportion of patients developed acute SJS in childhood. There was a significant correlation between visual acuity at initial referral to final recorded vision. Vision was found to continue to significantly deteriorate over time despite therapeutic interventions. Our regression model shows that ~62% of the variance in final vision can be explained by the initial vision and duration disease. The majority of our patients were on advanced ocular surface treatments including serum drops, topical ciclosporin and retinoic acid drops. Of particular significance, approximately a third of our patient cohort was also on systemic immune suppression. In conclusion, chronic SJS within the UK population under tertiary care remains an area of unmet clinical need. Current medical and surgical modalities prevent worsening of vision in severe ocular disease from SJS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.