Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109114›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Molecular Identification and Genetic Characterization of Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancer by Large-Panel Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis.

Guotian Pei, Mingwei Li, Xianjun Min, Qiang Liu, Dasheng Li, Yingshun Yang, Shuai Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Huina Wang, Huanqing Cheng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cells · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guotian PeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mingwei LiDepartment of Medicine, Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xianjun MinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dasheng LiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yingshun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuai WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huina WangDepartment of Medicine, Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Huanqing ChengDepartment of Medicine, Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Shanbo CaoDepartment of Medicine, Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yuqing HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Beijing Haidian Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe incidence of early stage multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasing in recent years, while the ideal strategy for its diagnosis and treatment remains controversial. The present study conducted genomic analysis to identify a new molecular classification method for accurately predicting the diagnosis and therapy for patients with early stage MPLC.

methodsA total of 240 tissue samples from 203 patients with multiple-non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) (n = 30), early stage single-NSCLC (Group A, n = 94), and advanced-stage NSCLC (Group B, n = 79) were subjected to targeted multigene panel sequencing.

resultsThirty patients for whom next-generation sequencing was performed on >1 tumor were identified, yielding 45 tumor pairs. The frequencies of

conclusionsComprehensive molecular evaluation allows the unambiguous delineation of clonal relationships among tumors. In comparison, the Martini and Melamed criteria have notable limitations in the recognition of IM. Our results support the adoption of a large panel to supplement histology for strongly discriminating NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

Indexed as

clonal relationshipsearly-stage multiple primary lung cancerepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)genetic characterizationL858Rmolecular classificationmultigene sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34109114
PMCPMC8183821
OpenAlexW3165786205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.