Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109103›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and joint infection2021

Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections.

Ahmed Siddiqi, Zuhdi E Abdo, Bryan D Springer, Antonia F Chen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and joint infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06309368 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

To Close or Not to Close: Surgical Site Infection Rates in Ostomy Primary Closure With 0.1% Betaine/Polyhexanide Wound Irrigation Compared to Conventional Ostomy Closure by Secondary Intention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasRan2024 to 2029Enrolled84ConditionsSurgical Site Infection, Wound Surgical, Colorectal DisordersArmsPrimary Ostomy Closure with 0.1% Betaine/0.1% Polyhexanide Wound Irrigation, Pursestring Closure
NCT06489431 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Irrisept vs Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation for Virgin Penile Prosthesis Placement: A Prospective Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsErectile Dysfunction, Penile Prosthesis, Complications, Infection or InflammationArmsChlorhexidine, Gentamicin, Rifampin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed SiddiqiOrthopaedic Institute of Central Jersey, a division of Ortho Alliance NJ, 2315 Route 34 South Manasquan, NJ 08736, USA.
Zuhdi E AbdoRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Orthopedics, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Bryan D SpringerOrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Department of Orthopedics Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA.
Antonia F ChenBrigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USOrthoCarolina · USOrthopaedic Center of New Jersey · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrigation and debridement in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) serve an integral role in the eradication of bacterial burden and subsequent re-infection rates. Identifying the optimal irrigation agent, however, remains challenging, as there is limited data on superiority. Direct comparison of different irrigation solutions remains difficult because of variability in treatment protocols. While basic science studies assist in the selection of irrigation fluids, in vitro results do not directly translate into clinical significance once implemented in vivo. Dilute povidone iodine, hydrogen peroxide, chlorhexidine gluconate, acetic acid, sodium hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, and preformed combination solutions all have potential against a broad spectrum of PJI pathogens with their own unique advantages and disadvantages. Future clinical studies are needed to identify ideal irrigation solutions with optimal bactericidal properties and low cytotoxicity for PJI treatment.

Identifiers

PMID34109103
PMCPMC8182666
OpenAlexW3165128152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.