Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34109043›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

A biocodicological analysis of the medieval library and archive from Orval Abbey, Belgium.

Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani, Jean-François Nieus, Silvia Soncin, Simon Hickinbotham, Marc Dieu, Julie Bouhy, Catherine Charles, Chiara Ruzzier, Thomas Falmagne, Xavier Hermand and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
50.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicolas Ruffini-RonzaniResearch Centre 'Pratiques médiévales de l'écrit', University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.
Jean-François NieusResearch Centre 'Pratiques médiévales de l'écrit', University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.
Silvia SoncinBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Simon HickinbothamBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Marc DieuMass Spectrometry platform, University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-542X
Julie BouhyDepartment of Physics, and Heritage, Transmissions and Inheritances Institute, University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.
Catherine CharlesRare Books Collection, Bibliothèque Universitaire Moretus Platin, University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.
Chiara RuzzierResearch Centre 'Pratiques médiévales de l'écrit', University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7958-4528
Thomas FalmagneRare Books Collection, National Library of Luxemburg, Luxemburg 1855.
Xavier HermandResearch Centre 'Pratiques médiévales de l'écrit', University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.
Matthew J CollinsDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-5501
Olivier DeparisDepartment of Physics, and Heritage, Transmissions and Inheritances Institute, University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, Namur 5000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2161-7208
University of Namur · BEUniversity of York · GBNational Library of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocodicological analysis of parchments from manuscript books and archives offers unprecedented insight into the materiality of medieval literacy. Using ZooMS for animal species identification, we explored almost the entire library and all the preserved single leaf charters of a single medieval Cistercian monastery (Orval Abbey, Belgium). Systematic non-invasive sampling of parchment collagen was performed on every charter and on the first bifolium from every quire of the 118 codicological units composing the books (1490 samples in total). Within the genuine production of the Orval scriptorium (26 units), a balanced use of calfskin (47.1%) and sheepskin (48.5%) was observed, whereas calfskin was less frequent (24.3%) in externally produced units acquired by the monastery (92 units). Calfskin was preferably used for higher quality manuscripts while sheepskin tends to be the standard choice for 'ordinary' manuscript book production. This finding is consistent with thirteenth-century parchment accounts from Beaulieu Abbey (England) where calfskin supply was more limited and its price higher. Our study reveals that the making of archival documents does not follow the same pattern as the production of library books. Although the five earliest preserved charters are made of calfskin, from the 1230s onwards, all charters from Orval are written on sheepskin.

Indexed as

charterscollagenmanuscriptsmass spectrometryparchment

Identifiers

PMID34109043
PMCPMC8170200
OpenAlexW3167322793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.