Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108994›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Admixed Populations Improve Power for Variant Discovery and Portability in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Meng Lin, Danny S Park, Noah A Zaitlen, Brenna M Henn, Christopher R Gignoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interpreting SNP heritability in admixed populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genes, culture, and scientific racism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng LinColorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Danny S ParkDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Noah A ZaitlenDepartment of Neurology and Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Brenna M HennDepartment of Anthropology, Center for Population Biology and the Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Christopher R GignouxColorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Funding

PAGE III: Population Architecture using Genomics and EpidemiologyR01HG010297 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GIGNOUX, CHRISTOPHER R, MATISE, TARA C. · 2019 to 2022
$6.5M
Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG006399 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PRICE, ALKES L · 2011 to 2024
$6.3M
Optimizing imputation for diverse populations in a distributed frameworkU01HG009080 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KENNY, EIMEAR ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Genomic Approaches to Population Health in Multi-Ethnic Hospital SystemsR01HG011345 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ARBOLEDA, VALERIE A, GIGNOUX, CHRISTOPHER R · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Supplement: Improving Inference of Genetic Architecture and Selection with African GenomesR35GM133531 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HENN, BRENNA M · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006399NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010297NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011345NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009080NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are primarily conducted in single-ancestry settings. The low transferability of results has limited our understanding of human genetic architecture across a range of complex traits. In contrast to homogeneous populations, admixed populations provide an opportunity to capture genetic architecture contributed from multiple source populations and thus improve statistical power. Here, we provide a mechanistic simulation framework to investigate the statistical power and transferability of GWAS under directional polygenic selection or varying divergence. We focus on a two-way admixed population and show that GWAS in admixed populations can be enriched for power in discovery by up to 2-fold compared to the ancestral populations under similar sample size. Moreover, higher accuracy of cross-population polygenic score estimates is also observed if variants and weights are trained in the admixed group rather than in the ancestral groups. Common variant associations are also more likely to replicate if first discovered in the admixed group and then transferred to an ancestral population, than the other way around (across 50 iterations with 1,000 causal SNPs, training on 10,000 individuals, testing on 1,000 in each population,

Indexed as

admixturecomplex trait geneticsgenetic architecturepolygenic scorestatistical power

Identifiers

PMID34108994
PMCPMC8181458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.