ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021
Systematic Review on Local Ancestor Inference From a Mathematical and Algorithmic Perspective.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive overview of the biological foundations of ADHD.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- Machine learning models incorporating genotype and ancestry improve severe asthma risk prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Methodological opportunities in genomic data analysis to advance health equity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Opportunities and challenges of local ancestry in genetic association analyses.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Sparse haplotype-based fine-scale local ancestry inference at scale reveals recent selection on immune responses.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genome-wide local ancestry and the functional consequences of admixture in African and European cattle populations.Heredity · 2025Article
- Fast and accurate local ancestry inference with Recomb-Mix.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023Review
- Genome-Wide Admixture Mapping Identifies Wild Ancestry-of-Origin Segments in Cultivated Robusta Coffee.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Multi-Omics Studies in Historically Excluded Populations: The Road to Equity.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Review
- Challenges in selecting admixture models and marker sets to infer genetic ancestry in a Brazilian admixed population.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Quest for Genes Involved in Adaptation to Climate Change in Ruminant Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotypic data provide deep insights into the population history and medical genetics. The local ancestry inference (LAI) (also termed local ancestry deconvolution) method uses the hidden Markov model (HMM) to solve the mathematical problem of ancestry reconstruction based on genomic data. HMM is combined with other statistical models and machine learning techniques for particular genetic tasks in a series of computer tools. In this article, we surveyed the mathematical structure, application characteristics, historical development, and benchmark analysis of the LAI method in detail, which will help researchers better understand and further develop LAI methods. Firstly, we extensively explore the mathematical structure of each model and its characteristic applications. Next, we use bibliometrics to show detailed model application fields and list articles to elaborate on the historical development. LAI publications had experienced a peak period during 2006-2016 and had kept on moving in the following years. The efficiency, accuracy, and stability of the existing models were evaluated by the benchmark. We find that phased data had higher accuracy in comparison with unphased data. We summarize these models with their distinct advantages and disadvantages. The Loter model uses dynamic programming to obtain a globally optimal solution with its parameter-free advantage. Aligned bases can be used directly in the Seqmix model if the genotype is hard to call. This research may help model developers to realize current challenges, develop more advanced models, and enable scholars to select appropriate models according to given populations and datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.