Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108982›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Genomic Prediction of Grain Yield in a Barley MAGIC Population Modeling Genotype per Environment Interaction.

Damiano Puglisi, Stefano Delbono, Andrea Visioni, Hakan Ozkan, İbrahim Kara, Ana M Casas, Ernesto Igartua, Giampiero Valè, Angela Roberta Lo Piero, Luigi Cattivelli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Water stress tolerance, genomic selection and identification of genomic regions in a MAGIC population of eggplant.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and evaluation of the utility of GenoBaits Peanut 40K for a peanut MAGIC population.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Damiano PuglisiDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Stefano DelbonoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Andrea VisioniBiodiversity and Crop Improvement Program, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Avenue Hafiane Cherkaoui, Rabat, Morocco.
Hakan OzkanDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey.
İbrahim KaraBahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute, Konya, Turkey.
Ana M CasasAula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC), Spanish Research Council, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ernesto IgartuaAula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC), Spanish Research Council, Zaragoza, Spain.
Giampiero ValèDiSIT, Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.
Angela Roberta Lo PieroDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Luigi CattivelliCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Alessandro TondelliCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Agostino FricanoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei · ESUniversity of Catania · ITCukurova University · TRUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-parent Advanced Generation Inter-crosses (MAGIC) lines have mosaic genomes that are generated shuffling the genetic material of the founder parents following pre-defined crossing schemes. In cereal crops, these experimental populations have been extensively used to investigate the genetic bases of several traits and dissect the genetic bases of epistasis. In plants, genomic prediction models are usually fitted using either diverse panels of mostly unrelated accessions or individuals of biparental families and several empirical analyses have been conducted to evaluate the predictive ability of models fitted to these populations using different traits. In this paper, we constructed, genotyped and evaluated a barley MAGIC population of 352 individuals developed with a diverse set of eight founder parents showing contrasting phenotypes for grain yield. We combined phenotypic and genotypic information of this MAGIC population to fit several genomic prediction models which were cross-validated to conduct empirical analyses aimed at examining the predictive ability of these models varying the sizes of training populations. Moreover, several methods to optimize the composition of the training population were also applied to this MAGIC population and cross-validated to estimate the resulting predictive ability. Finally, extensive phenotypic data generated in field trials organized across an ample range of water regimes and climatic conditions in the Mediterranean were used to fit and cross-validate multi-environment genomic prediction models including G×E interaction, using both genomic best linear unbiased prediction and reproducing kernel Hilbert space along with a non-linear Gaussian Kernel. Overall, our empirical analyses showed that genomic prediction models trained with a limited number of MAGIC lines can be used to predict grain yield with values of predictive ability that vary from 0.25 to 0.60 and that beyond QTL mapping and analysis of epistatic effects, MAGIC population might be used to successfully fit genomic prediction models. We concluded that for grain yield, the single-environment genomic prediction models examined in this study are equivalent in terms of predictive ability while, in general, multi-environment models that explicitly split marker effects in main and environmental-specific effects outperform simpler multi-environment models.

Indexed as

barleyGBLUPgenomic predictiongenotype x environment interactionMAGIC

Identifiers

PMID34108982
PMCPMC8183822
OpenAlexW3164760082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.