Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108848›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of ecology & evolution2020

Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Colin M Wright, James L L Lichtenstein, Lauren P Luscuskie, Graham A Montgomery, Sara Geary, Jonathan N Pruitt, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Carl N Keiser

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A variable refractory period increases collective performance in noisy environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Colin M WrightDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16801, USA.
James L L LichtensteinDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA.
Lauren P LuscuskieDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA.
Graham A MontgomeryDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA.
Sara GearyWest Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV, USA.
Jonathan N PruittDepartment of Psychology, Neurobiology & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1.
Noa Pinter-WollmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1606, USA.
Carl N KeiserDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

Modeling how keystone individuals emerge and influence disease transmissionR01GM115509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PINTER-WOLLMAN, NOA MICHAL · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social spiders are thought to predominantly receive information about their environment through vibrational cues. Thus, group living introduces the challenge of distinguishing useful vibrational information from the background noise of nestmates. Here we investigate whether spatial proximity between colony-mates may allow social spiders (

Indexed as

collective actioncommunicationforagingseismic cuessocialityspiders

Identifiers

PMID34108848
PMCPMC8186555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.