ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2021
Updates in Magnetic Resonance Venous Imaging.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Presacral Vascular Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D-CT for Surgical Planning in Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: The Gynecological Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Venous-significant intracranial hemorrhage in neonatal HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia: imaging phenotypes, diagnostic pitfalls, and prognostic implications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Non-contrast MR angiography: physical principles and clinical applications in chest, abdomen and pelvis imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Noninvasive diagnostic imaging of pelvic venous disorders.Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) · 2024Review
- Superficial Venous Reflux Intervention Guided by Triggered Angiography Non-Contrast-Enhanced Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Different QFlow Pattern from Health Controls.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For years, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been a leading imaging modality in the assessment of venous disease involving the pelvis and lower extremities. Current advancement in noncontrast MRA techniques enables imaging of a larger subset of patients previously excluded due to allergy or renal insufficiency, allowing for preintervention assessment and planning. In this article, the current status of MR venography, with a focus on current advancements, will be presented. Protocols and parameters for MR venographic imaging of the pelvis and lower extremities, including contrast and noncontrast enhanced techniques, will be reviewed based on a recent literature review of applied MR venographic techniques. Finally, several disease-specific entities, including pelvic congestion and compression syndromes, will be discussed with a focus on imaging parameters that may best characterize these disease processes and optimize anatomical planning prior to intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.