ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021
Long term outcomes of the French ASTIS systemic sclerosis cohort using the global rank composite score.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for rheumatic diseases: best practice recommendations from the EBMT Practice Harmonization and Guidelines Committee.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Guideline
- Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Survival and disease reactivation after autologous stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: a single-centre cohort.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- [Survey of care situation for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis with pulmonary involvement in Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Article
- Autologous stem cell transplant for severe, progressive juvenile systemic sclerosis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Autologous Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023Review
- Review
- Reconstitution of the immune system and clinical correlates after stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Life after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis.Journal of blood medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two randomised trials (ASTIS, SCOT) of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) versus monthly Cyclophosphamide for severe Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients used similar inclusion criteria, but different primary endpoints: event-free-survival (EFS) at 24 months in ASTIS versus the global rank composite score (GRCS) at 54 months in SCOT. Here we analysed the French ASTIS cohort (n = 49) outcome using the same GRCS endpoint as reported in SCOT. All patients, randomised to AHSCT (n = 26) or Cyclophosphamide (n = 23), were evaluated for the non-parametric GRCS endpoint based on: death, EFS, forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at 60 months. Secondary endpoints were: EFS, overall survival (OS), HAQ DI and organ status. In intention-to-treat analysis, the GRCS demonstrated superiority for AHSCT (median: 9 versus -19, p = 0.018), mRSS (Δ mRSS: -16 versus -9, p = 0.02), and HAQ-DI (ΔHAQ-DI: -0.89 versus -0.2, p = 0.05) with no significant difference in OS, EFS, lung, heart and kidney function between the groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrates long term benefits of non-myeloablative AHSCT when assessed by the five longitudinal measures within GRCS affording direct primary endpoint comparison between ASTIS and SCOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.