Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108635›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Transient elastography versus liver biopsy: discordance in evaluations for fibrosis and steatosis from a pathology standpoint.

Jiayun M Fang, Jerome Cheng, Michael F Chang, Joseph Ahn, Maria Westerhoff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Expert consensus on MRI diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (version 2023)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayun M FangDepartment of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. fjiayun@med.umich.edu.
Jerome ChengDepartment of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8949-7006
Michael F ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Joseph AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Maria WesterhoffDepartment of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-0111
Michigan Medicine · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is a non-invasive method of evaluating liver fibrosis and steatosis. It can easily be performed in the outpatient setting and has been suggested as an alternative to liver biopsy. However, VCTE and biopsy discrepancies commonly occur. Patient characteristics, procedure performance, and liver features can impact the reliability of VCTE results. We identified 82 patients who received VCTE and biopsy within one month to assess how frequently major discrepancies occur and to determine the role of the liver biopsy in this workup. In our study, 35.4% of patients had a major fibrosis discrepancy, which was defined as advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis by VCTE and no to minimal fibrosis on biopsy. This was significantly associated with increased BMI, and liver features including steatohepatitis, inflammation, congestion, and cholestasis were important contributors to discrepancies. All patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on liver biopsy were appropriately detected by VCTE (n = 28). Detection of steatosis was less sensitive as 19% (n = 4 of 21) of patients with moderate to severe steatosis on biopsy were missed by VCTE. Liver biopsy has been traditionally performed for diagnosis, but with the emergence of non-invasive tools to evaluate for liver fibrosis and steatosis, biopsies are now additionally being performed to confirm findings from noninvasive procedures. Although VCTE is a highly sensitive tool for liver fibrosis, it is not as specific, and therefore, the liver biopsy remains the gold standard for accurate fibrosis assessment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyBody Mass IndexElasticity Imaging TechniquesFatty LiverFemaleHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34108635
OpenAlexW3168844723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.