Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

DNA degradation in human teeth exposed to thermal stress.

Diego Lozano-Peral, Leticia Rubio, Ignacio Santos, María Jesús Gaitán, Enrique Viguera, Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Minimally Destructive Radiocarbon Dating of Bone.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2026
    Article
  3. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dental DNA as an Indicator of Post-Mortem Interval (PMI): A Pilot Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diego Lozano-Peral *Department of Forensic Dentistry and Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA (CE-18), School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8072-0355
Leticia Rubio *Department of Forensic Dentistry and Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA (CE-18), School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain. lorubio@uma.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-624X
Ignacio SantosDepartment of Forensic Dentistry and Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA (CE-18), School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
María Jesús GaitánDepartment of Forensic Dentistry and Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA (CE-18), School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
Enrique VigueraDepartment of Cellular Biology, Genetics and Physiology, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5475-3807
Stella Martín-de-Las-HerasDepartment of Forensic Dentistry and Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA (CE-18), School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-951X
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human identification from burned remains poses a challenge to forensic laboratories, and DNA profiling is widely used for this purpose. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of temperature on DNA degradation in human teeth. Thirty teeth were exposed to temperatures of 100, 200, or 400 °C for 60 min. DNA was quantified by Real-Time qPCR (Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification Kit) and fluorescence spectroscopy (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer). DNA degradation was evaluated by using STR markers (AmpFLSTR Identifiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit) to determine the allele and locus dropout, inter-locus balance, and degradation slope (observed (Oa) to expected (Ea) locus peak height ratio against the molecular weight). Most of the genomic DNA was degraded between 100 °C and 200 °C. At 100 °C, locus dropout ratios showed significant differences between the largest loci (FGA, D7S820, D18S51, D16S539, D2S1338 and CSF1PO) and amelogenin. Inter-locus balance values significantly differed between all dye channels except between NED and PET. The dropout ratio between D18S51 (NED) and amelogenin (PET) can be recommended for the evaluation of DNA degradation. The Oa/Ea regression model can predict locus peak heights in DNA degradation (R

Indexed as

Heat-Shock ResponseAdultAgedDNADNA FingerprintingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionToothYoung AdultDNA

Identifiers

PMID34108558
PMCPMC8190102
OpenAlexW3169222791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.