Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34108067›Full record

Observational studyPublic health nutrition2022

Lifestyle and eating habits before and during COVID-19 quarantine in Brazil.

Tamires Cm Souza, Lívya A Oliveira, Marina M Daniel, Lívia G Ferreira, Ceres M Della Lucia, Juliana C Liboredo, Lucilene R Anastácio

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tamires Cm SouzaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1077-0186
Lívya A OliveiraDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-633X
Marina M DanielDepartment of Nutrition, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-7682
Lívia G FerreiraDepartment of Nutrition, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8089-351X
Ceres M Della LuciaDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6731-5694
Juliana C LiboredoDepartment of Food, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5972-8480
Lucilene R AnastácioDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-0722
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess changes in daily habits, food choices and lifestyle of adult Brazilians before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designThis observational study was carried out with Brazilian adults through an online questionnaire 5 months after the social distance measures implementation. The McNemar, McNemar–Bowker and Wilcoxon tests were used to investigate differences before and during the COVID pandemic period, adopting the statistical significance of P < 0·05.

settingBrazil.

participantsTotally, 1368 volunteers aged 18+ years.

resultsThe volunteers reported a lower frequency of breakfast, morning and lunch snacks (P < 0·05) and a higher frequency of evening snacks and other meal categories during the pandemic period (P < 0·05). The results showed an increase in the consumption of bakery products, instant meals and fast food, while the consumption of vegetables and fruits decreased (P < 0·005). There was a significant increase in the frequency of consumption of alcoholic beverages (P < 0·001), but a reduction in the dose (P < 0·001), increased frequency of smoking (P = 0·007), an increase in sleep and screen time in hours and decrease in physical activity (P < 0·001).

conclusionsIt was possible to observe an increase in screen time, hours of sleep, smoking and drinking frequency. On the other hand, there was a reduction in the dose of alcoholic beverages but also in the practice of physical activity. Eating habits also changed, reducing the performance of daytime meals and increasing the performance of nighttime meals. The frequency of consumption of instant meals and fast food has increased, while consumption of fruits and vegetables has decreased.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultBrazilFeeding BehaviorHumansLife StylePandemicsQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesAlcohol useCoronavirusFood choicesLockdownSARS-CoV-2Smoking

Identifiers

PMID34108067
PMCPMC8280396
OpenAlexW3168184242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.