Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107996›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2021

Simple rapid in vitro screening method for SARS-CoV-2 anti-virals that identifies potential cytomorbidity-associated false positives.

Kexin Yan, Daniel J Rawle, Thuy T Le, Andreas Suhrbier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive Phytochemical Profiling ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EfficientAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kexin Yan *QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.
Daniel J Rawle *QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.
Thuy T LeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.
Andreas SuhrbierQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia. Andreas.Suhrbier@qimrberghofer.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-9025
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1173880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe international SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in an urgent need to identify new anti-viral drugs for treatment of COVID-19. The initial step to identifying potential candidates usually involves in vitro screening that includes standard cytotoxicity controls. Under-appreciated is that viable, but stressed or otherwise compromised cells, can also have a reduced capacity to replicate virus. A refinement proposed herein for in vitro drug screening thus includes a simple growth assay to identify drug concentrations that cause cellular stress or "cytomorbidity", as distinct from cytotoxicity or loss of viability.

methodsA simple rapid bioassay is presented for antiviral drug screening using Vero E6 cells and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 induced cytopathic effects (CPE) measured using crystal violet staining. We use high cell density for cytotoxicity assays, and low cell density for cytomorbidity assays.

resultsThe assay clearly illustrated the anti-viral activity of remdesivir, a drug known to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. In contrast, nitazoxanide, oleuropein, cyclosporine A and ribavirin all showed no ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 CPE. Hydroxychloroquine, cyclohexamide, didemnin B, γ-mangostin and linoleic acid were all able to inhibit viral CPE at concentrations that did not induce cytotoxicity. However, these drugs inhibited CPE at concentrations that induced cytomorbidity, indicating non-specific anti-viral activity.

conclusionsWe describe the methodology for a simple in vitro drug screening assay that identifies potential anti-viral drugs via their ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2-induced CPE. The additional growth assay illustrated how several drugs display anti-viral activity at concentrations that induce cytomorbidity. For instance, hydroxychloroquine showed anti-viral activity at concentrations that slow cell growth, arguing that its purported in vitro anti-viral activity arises from non-specific impairment of cellular activities. The cytomorbidity assay can therefore rapidly exclude potential false positives.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsBiological AssayChlorocebus aethiopsCytopathogenic Effect, ViralDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalInhibitory Concentration 50SARS-CoV-2Vero CellsVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsCytomorbidityCytopathic effectCytotoxicityDrug screeningSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34107996
PMCPMC8188739
OpenAlexW3168461337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.