ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021
Using four decades of FDA orphan drug designations to describe trends in rare disease drug development: substantial growth seen in development of drugs for rare oncologic, neurologic, and pediatric-onset diseases.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Patient Focused Drug Development Meeting Reports for Conditions Affecting Neurodevelopment.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Pooled it
- Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Evaluations of Orphan Drugs in Rare Diseases: An Umbrella Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Pooled it
- Patent Analysis Perspectives on China's Orphan Drug R&D: Status and Technology Characteristics.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Reconceiving orphan drug market exclusivity as a conditional public-law entitlement: a sustainable regulatory governance model with comparative lessons for China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Strategic Drivers Behind Early Withdrawal of Orphan Designations in the EU: A Retrospective Analysis (2000-2024).Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Assessing rare disease understanding: a novel disease readiness level framework.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Regulatory alignment in FDA expedited pathways for infectious diseases: a decadal review with predictive modeling insights.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Cell and Gene Therapy for Rare Disease Treatment.International journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Research and development investments for biologics independently developed by US biotechnology startups, 2017-2023.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Evolving Research and Development Landscape for Rare Diseases: Growing Concerns Over Orphan Drug Lag in Japan.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Drug Development in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review of Promising Treatments, Old Challenges, and New Strategies.Paediatric drugs · 2025Review
- Policy strategies for inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine research.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Development of a novel tool for individual treatment trials in mucopolysaccharidosis.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Challenges in evaluation and reimbursement of drugs for rare diseases in Saudi Arabia: a Delphi expert consensus.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Determinants of orphan drug health technology assessment in South Korea: an empirical analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Views and opinions of the general public about the reimbursement of expensive medicines in the Netherlands.PloS one · 2025Article
- Human-based complexFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Impact of changes in regulatory framework on approval of medicines for rare diseases and applicability to market access policies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Expediting treatments in the 21st century: orphan drugs and accelerated approvals.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Rare diseases: What rheumatologists need to know?Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrphan drug designations are a useful proxy to investigate trends in rare disease drug development. Drug developers must receive a designation before they are eligible for the economic incentives of the Orphan Drug Act in the United States. We created a database of all orphan drugs designated between 1983 and 2019 that included numerous drug characteristics, including therapeutic area. In addition, we constructed a "broad disease" categorization of designations as an alternative to therapeutic area, based on disease etiology and age of onset rather than organ system. By looking at the pattern of orphan drug designations over the past four decades, this analysis studied the impact of the evolving rare disease drug development landscape and considers the future of rare disease therapies over the coming decades.
resultsBetween 1983 and 2019, a total of 5099 drugs and biologics received orphan drug designation. Designations more than doubled between the 1980s and 1990s, almost doubled between the 1990s and 2000s, and almost tripled in number between the 2000s and 2010s. The top three therapeutic areas represented in the orphan drug designations were: oncology (1910, 37%), neurology (674, 13%), and infectious diseases (436, 9%). The broad disease categorization found that the proportion of designations for pediatric-onset diseases has increased in the most recent decade to 27%.
conclusionsAnalysis of the last four decades of orphan drug designation indicates seismic shifts have occurred in the rare disease drug development space. The number of designations granted more than quadrupled between the 1990s and 2010s. While these substantial increases led to growth in the absolute number of designations within all therapeutic areas (bar one) and broad disease categories, the relative proportions have seen considerable change over time. In the most recent decade, there have been notable increases in the proportion of drugs in oncology, pediatric-onset diseases, and neurologic disorders. The dramatic rise in overall orphan designations over the past four decades suggests we may continue to see an upward trajectory in designations leading to an increased number of approvals for drugs and biologics designed specifically for diagnosing, preventing, and treating rare diseases in the coming decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.