Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107985›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021

T2-mapping increase is the prevalent imaging biomarker of myocardial involvement in active COVID-19: a Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance study.

Nicola Galea, Livia Marchitelli, Giacomo Pambianchi, Federica Catapano, Giulia Cundari, Lucia Ilaria Birtolo, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Francesco Fedele, Carlo Catalano and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MRI of cardiac involvement in COVID-19.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for evaluation of cardiac involvement in COVID-19: recommendations by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. 2021-2022 state of our JCMR.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola GaleaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Livia MarchitelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo PambianchiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Federica CatapanoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Giulia CundariDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Lucia Ilaria BirtoloDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Viviana MaestriniDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Massimo ManconeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Francesco FedeleDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CatalanoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Marco FranconeDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. marco.francone@hunimed.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-7906-3420
Policlinico Umberto I · ITHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of myocardial involvement can be relevant in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients to timely target symptomatic treatment and decrease the occurrence of the cardiac sequelae of the infection. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in characterizing myocardial damage in active COVID-19 patients, through the correlation between qualitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers with clinical and laboratory evidence of myocardial injury.

methodsIn this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 27 patients with diagnosis of active COVID-19 and suspected cardiac involvement, referred to our institution for CMR between March 2020 and January 2021. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, including high sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), and CMR imaging data were obtained. Relationships between CMR parameters, clinical and laboratory findings were explored. Comparisons were made with age-, sex- and risk factor-matched control group of 27 individuals, including healthy controls and patients without other signs or history of myocardial disease, who underwent CMR examination between January 2020 and January 2021.

resultsThe median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR examination was 20 (13.5-31.5) days. Hs-cTnT values were collected within 24 h prior to CMR and resulted abnormally increased in 18 patients (66.6%). A total of 20 cases (74%) presented tissue signal abnormalities, including increased myocardial native T1 (n = 11), myocardial T2 (n = 14) and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) (n = 10), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (n = 12) or pericardial enhancement (n = 2). A CMR diagnosis of myocarditis was established in 9 (33.3%), pericarditis in 2 (7.4%) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries in 3 (11.11%) patients. T2 mapping values showed a moderate positive linear correlation with Hs-cTnT (r = 0.58; p = 0.002). A high degree positive linear correlation between ECV and Hs-cTnT was also found (r 0.77; p < 0.001).

conclusionsCMR allows in vivo recognition and characterization of myocardial damage in a cohort of selected COVID-19 individuals by means of a multiparametric scanning protocol including conventional imaging and T1-T2 mapping sequences. Abnormal T2 mapping was the most commonly abnormality observed in our cohort and positively correlated with hs-cTnT values, reflecting the predominant edematous changes characterizing the active phase of disease.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCardiomyopathiesCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsCardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceCOVID-19InflammationMyocarditisSARS-CoV-2Troponin

Identifiers

PMID34107985
PMCPMC8189727
OpenAlexW3167940117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.