Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107955›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Progress and challenges of integrated drug efficacy surveillance for uncomplicated malaria in Thailand.

Prayuth Sudathip, Aungkana Saejeng, Nardlada Khantikul, Thannikar Thongrad, Suravadee Kitchakarn, Rungniran Sugaram, Cheewanan Lertpiriyasuwat, Darin Areechokchai, Deyer Gopinath, David Sintasath and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antiplasmodial Compounds fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changing genetic profiles ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Prayuth SudathipDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Aungkana SaejengDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Nardlada KhantikulOffice of Disease Prevention and Control Region 1, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thannikar ThongradDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Suravadee KitchakarnDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Rungniran SugaramDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Cheewanan LertpiriyasuwatDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Darin AreechokchaiDivision of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Deyer GopinathWorld Health Organization, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
David SintasathU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Regional Development Mission for Asia, United States Agency for International Development, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pascal RingwaldWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sathapana NaowaratInform Asia: USAID's Health Research Program, RTI International, Bangkok, Thailand.
Niparueradee PinyajeerapatU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Regional Development Mission for Asia, United States Agency for International Development, Bangkok, Thailand.
Maria Dorina BustosWorld Health Organization, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jui A ShahInform Asia: USAID's Health Research Program, RTI International, Bangkok, Thailand. juishah@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-4738
Ministry of Public Health · THUnited States Agency for International Development · USRTI International · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

USAID AID-486-LA-15-00002World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated drug efficacy surveillance (iDES) was formally introduced nationally across Thailand in fiscal year 2018 (FY2018), building on a history of drug efficacy monitoring and interventions. According to the National Malaria Elimination Strategy for Thailand 2017-2026, diagnosis is microscopically confirmed, treatment is prescribed, and patients are followed up four times to ensure cure.

methodsRoutine patient data were extracted from the malaria information system for FY2018-FY2020. Treatment failure of first-line therapy was defined as confirmed parasite reappearance within 42 days for Plasmodium falciparum and 28 days for Plasmodium vivax. The primary outcome was the crude drug efficacy rate, estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, at day 42 for P. falciparum treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus primaquine, and day 28 for P. vivax treated with chloroquine plus primaquine; day 60 and day 90 efficacy were secondary outcomes for P. vivax.

resultsThe proportion of patients with outcomes recorded at day 42 for P. falciparum malaria and at day 28 for P. vivax malaria has been increasing, with FY2020 follow-up rates of 61.5% and 57.2%, respectively. For P. falciparum malaria, day 42 efficacy in FY2018 was 92.4% (n = 249), in FY2019 93.3% (n = 379), and in FY2020 98.0% (n = 167). Plasmodium falciparum recurrences occurred disproportionally in Sisaket Province, with day 42 efficacy rates of 75.9% in FY2018 (n = 59) and 49.4% in FY2019 (n = 49), leading to an update in first-line therapy to pyronaridine-artesunate at the provincial level, rolled out in FY2020. For P. vivax malaria, day 28 efficacy (chloroquine efficacy) was 98.5% in FY2018 (n = 2048), 99.1% in FY2019 (n = 2206), and 99.9% in FY2020 (n = 2448), and day 90 efficacy (primaquine efficacy) was 94.8%, 96.3%, and 97.1%, respectively.

conclusionsIn Thailand, iDES provided operationally relevant data on drug efficacy, enabling the rapid amendment of treatment guidelines to improve patient outcomes and reduce the potential for the spread of drug-resistant parasites. A strong case-based surveillance system, integration with other health system processes, supporting biomarker collection and molecular analyses, and cross-border collaboration may maximize the potential of iDES in countries moving towards elimination.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxThailandTreatment OutcomeAntimalarialsAntimalarialDrug efficacyDrug resistanceMalaria eliminationSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34107955
PMCPMC8188767
OpenAlexW3138899034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.