Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107440›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2021

Empirical validation of gradient field models for an accurate ADC measured on clinical 3T MR systems in body oncologic applications.

Yuxi Pang, Dariya I Malyarenko, Ghoncheh Amouzandeh, Enzo Barberi, Michael Cole, Axel Vom Endt, Johannes Peeters, Ek T Tan, Thomas L Chenevert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuxi PangRadiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: yuxipang@umich.edu.
Dariya I MalyarenkoRadiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Ghoncheh AmouzandehRadiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Enzo BarberiModus Medical Devices Inc., London, ON, CA, Canada.
Michael ColeModus Medical Devices Inc., London, ON, CA, Canada.
Axel Vom EndtSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, DE, Germany.
Johannes PeetersMR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Best, NL, Netherlands.
Ek T TanRadiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States.
Thomas L ChenevertRadiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan · USHospital for Special Surgery · USPhilips (Netherlands) · NLSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DE

Funding

Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
Quantitative DW-MRI for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Response AssessmentU01CA166104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, GALBAN, CRAIG J · 2012 to 2019
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo empirically corroborate vendor-provided gradient nonlinearity (GNL) characteristics and demonstrate efficient GNL bias correction for human brain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) across 3T MR systems and spatial locations.

methodsSpatial distortion vector fields (DVF) were mapped in 3D using a surface fiducial array phantom for individual gradient channels on three 3T MR platforms from different vendors. Measured DVF were converted into empirical 3D GNL tensors and compared with their theoretical counterparts derived from vendor-provided spherical harmonic (SPH) coefficients. To illustrate spatial impact of GNL on ADC, diffusion weighted imaging using three orthogonal gradient directions was performed on a volunteer brain positioned at isocenter (as a reference) and offset superiorly by 10-17 cm (>10% predicted GNL bias). The SPH tensor-based GNL correction was applied to individual DWI gradient directions, and derived ADC was compared with low-bias reference for human brain white matter (WM) ROIs.

resultsEmpiric and predicted GNL errors were comparable for all three studied 3T MR systems, with <1.0% differences in the median and width of spatial histograms for individual GNL tensor elements. Median (±width) of ADC (10

conclusionThe phantom-based spatial distortion measurements validated vendor-provided gradient fields, and accurate WM ADC was recovered regardless of spatial locations and clinical MR platforms using system-specific tensor-based GNL correction for routine DWI.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNonlinear DynamicsBrainHumansMedical OncologyPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsApparent diffusion coefficientDiffusion weighted imagingGradient nonlinearity correctionSpherical harmonic coefficientsSurface-grid geometric distortion phantom

Identifiers

PMID34107440
PMCPMC8268998
OpenAlexW3167681418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.