Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107339›Full record

ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2021

Methods to Assess Disease Activity and Severity in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Critical Literature Review.

Hadir Shakshouk, Eric R Tkaczyk, Edward W Cowen, Rokea A El-Azhary, Shahrukh K Hashmi, Saad J Kenderian, Julia S Lehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Histopathologic Analysis of Chronic Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease.The American Journal of dermatopathology · 2024
    Article
  6. Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hadir ShakshoukDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Dermatology, Andrology and Venerology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Eric R TkaczykDermatology and Research Services, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN; Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Edward W CowenDermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rokea A El-AzharyDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shahrukh K HashmiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Saad J KenderianDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Julia S LehmanDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Lehman.julia@mayo.edu.

Funding

GVHD quantitative assessment in skin of Veterans post-HCTIK2CX001785 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI TKACZYK, ERIC R · 2019 to 2024
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a potentially debilitating complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, confers increased risk for mortality. Whereas treatment decisions rely on an accurate assessment of disease activity/severity, validated methods of assessing cutaneous cGVHD activity/severity appear to be limited. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate current data on the assessment of disease activity/severity in cutaneous cGVHD. Using modified PRISMA methods, we performed a critical literature review for relevant articles. Our literature search identified 1741 articles, of which 1635 were excluded as duplicates or failure to meet inclusion criteria. Of the included studies (n = 106), 39 (37%) addressed clinical and/or histopathologic parameters, 53 (50%) addressed serologic parameters, 8 (7.5%) addressed imaging parameters, and 6 (5.5%) addressed computer-based technologies. The only formally validated metric of disease activity/severity assessment in cutaneous cGVHD is the National Institutes of Health consensus scoring system, which is founded on clinical assessment alone. The lack of an objective marker for cGVHD necessitates further studies. An evaluation of the potential contributions of serologic, imaging, and/or computer-based technologies is warranted.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSkin DiseasesHumansSeverity of Illness IndexSkindermatologyDisease activityGraft-versus-host diseaseGVHDMonitoringSclerotic GVHDskinskin biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34107339
PMCPMC8719782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.