ReviewStem cell reports2021
Unproven stem cell interventions: A global public health problem requiring global deliberation.
Review in Stem cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cell Therapy for Inflammatory Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of clinical trials and Progress in stem cell therapies for advanced heart failure.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Confronting medical grifting: Fraudulent and unproven products and interventions in apheresis, transfusion and biotherapies.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Basic Points to Consider for Cell Storage under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Challenging Reward Structures and Organizational Cultures that Propagate Stem Cell Hyperbole.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- Myths and Realities about the Private Sector Stem Cell Industry in Malaysia.Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Toward equitable regenerative medicine: a health equity research framework for emerging regenerative treatments.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- An update on the use of stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction.Asian journal of urology · 2024Review
- A WHO remit to improve global standards for medical products of human origin.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
- Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Post Intra-Articular Injection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Genes drive organisms and slippery slopes.Pathogens and global health · 2024Review
- Exploring Stem-Cell-Based Therapies for Retinal Regeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond?Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Unproven cell interventions in Poland and the exploitation of European Union law on advanced therapy medicinal products.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Stem cell-based combinatorial therapies for spinal cord injury: a narrative review of current research and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Financial risks posed by unproven cell interventions: Estimation of refunds from medical expense deductions in Japan.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- Improved MSC Minimal Criteria to Maximize Patient Safety: A Call to Embrace Tissue Factor and Hemocompatibility Assessment of MSC Products.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- International stem cell tourism: a critical literature review and evidence-based recommendations.International health · 2022Review
- Role of Physicians in Guiding Patients Away From Unproven Stem Cell Interventions.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unproven stem cell intervention (SCI) industry is a global health problem. Despite efforts of some nations, the industry continues to flourish. In this paper, we call for a global approach and the establishment of a World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Advisory Committee on Regenerative Medicine to tackle this issue and provide guidance. The WHO committee can harmonize national regulations; promote regulatory approaches responsive to unmet patient needs; and formulate an education campaign against misinformation. Fostering an international dialog and developing recommendations that can be adopted by member states would effectively address the global market of unproven SCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.