Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107158›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2021

Treatment-related risk factors for inhibitor development in non-severe hemophilia A after 50 cumulative exposure days: A case-control study.

Amal Abdi, Corien L Eckhardt, Alice S van Velzen, Caroline Vuong, Michiel Coppens, Giancarlo Castaman, Dan P Hart, Cedric Hermans, Britta Laros-van Gorkom, Frank W G Leebeek and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Augmented emicizumab-driven coagulation potential in hemophilia A state byResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Spectrum, Subtype Distribution, and Treatment Outcomes in von Willebrand Disease: A Prospective Study from a Hemophilia Treatment Center in Pakistan.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Amal AbdiPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corien L EckhardtPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alice S van VelzenPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline VuongPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel CoppensVascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giancarlo CastamanOncology, Center for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-1317
Dan P HartBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, QMUL, London, UK.
Cedric HermansHaemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Britta Laros-van GorkomHematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frank W G LeebeekHematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria Elisa MancusoCenter for Thrombosis and Hemorrhagic Diseases, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Maria G MazzucconiHematology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Simon McRaeHematology, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Johannes OldenburgInstitute of Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine Bonn, University Clinic Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph MalePaediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna G van der BomClinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karin FijnvandraatPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Samantha C GouwPediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
INSIGHT Study Group
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEErasmus MC · NLHumanitas University · ITLaunceston General Hospital · AUMedical University of Vienna · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal London Hospital · GBSanquin · NLSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-severe hemophilia A patients have a life-long inhibitor risk. Yet, no studies have analyzed risk factors for inhibitor development after 50 factor VIII (FVIII) exposure days (EDs).

objectivesThis case-control study investigated treatment-related risk factors for inhibitor development in non-severe hemophilia A and assessed whether these risk factors were different for early versus late inhibitor development. PATIENTS/

methodsNon-severe hemophilia A patients (FVIII:C 2%-40%) were selected from the INSIGHT study. Inhibitor-positive patients were defined as early (<50 EDs) or late (>50EDs) cases and matched to 1-4 inhibitor-negative controls by year of birth, cumulative number of EDs, and center/country. We investigated treatment intensity during the last 10 EDs prior to inhibitor development. Intensive treatment was defined as: surgery, peak treatment (10 consecutive EDs), and high mean FVIII dose (>45 IU/kg/ED). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression.

resultsOf 2709 patients, we analyzed 63 early and 26 late cases and 195 and 71 respectively matched controls. Peak treatment was associated with early and late inhibitor risk (crude OR 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.4; 4.0, 95%CI 1.1-14.3). This association was slightly less pronounced after adjustment for mean FVIII dose. High mean FVIII dose was also associated with early and late inhibitor risk (crude OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.5-5.1; 4.5, 95%CI 1.2-16.6). Surgery increased inhibitor risk for early cases. This was less pronounced for late cases.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that intensive FVIII treatment remains a risk factor for inhibitor development in non-severe hemophilia A after more than 50 EDs. Therefore, persistent caution is required throughout the life-time treatment course.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHemostaticsCase-Control StudiesFactor VIIIHumansOdds RatioRisk FactorsFactor VIIIHemostaticsanti-drug antibodyfactor VIIIhemophilia Ainhibitorrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34107158
PMCPMC8457239
OpenAlexW3171388775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.