Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107142›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Prioritizing Chinese medicine clinical research questions in cancer palliative care from patient and caregiver perspectives.

Charlene H L Wong, Wendy Wong, Wai Ling Lin, David K Y Au, Justin C Y Wu, Ting Hung Leung, Irene X Y Wu, Vincent C H Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Burden of Cancer in Pakistan: An Analysis of 2019 Data.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prioritizing Chinese medicine clinical research questions in cancer palliative care from patient and caregiver perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlene H L WongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Wendy WongNational Institution of TCM Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8731-0498
Wai Ling LinHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
David K Y AuHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Justin C Y WuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-2846-9818
Ting Hung LeungJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8715-0823
Irene X Y WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-2376
Vincent C H ChungJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-4492
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChinese medicine (CM) modalities, including acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), are popular palliative interventions among patients with cancer, but further clinical research is required to assess their effectiveness and safety.

objectiveTo prioritize top ten important CM clinical research questions from patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers' perspectives via a face-to-face prioritization workshop in Hong Kong.

methodsA list of 25 CM clinical research questions for cancer palliative care, which were identified from existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overview of SRs, was presented to 17 participants (patients with cancer [n = 5], cancer survivors [n = 6] and caregivers [n = 6]). The participants were then invited to establish consensus on prioritizing top ten research questions.

resultsAmong the top ten priorities, five (50%) focused on acupuncture and related therapies, while five (50%) were on CHM. The three most important research priorities were (i) manual acupuncture plus opioids for relieving pain; (ii) CHM for improving quality of life among patients receiving chemotherapy; and (iii) concurrent use of CHM plus loperamide for reducing stomatitis.

conclusionThe top ten participant-endorsed CM clinical research priorities for cancer palliative care can guide local researchers on future direction. They can also inform local research funders on patient-centred allocation of limited funding. Under limited research funding, the most important co-prioritized research question from professional and patient perspectives may be addressed first. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers participated in conduct of the study to prioritize CM clinical research questions.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPalliative CareQuality of Lifepalliative carepatient participationresearch prioritiesstakeholder participationtraditional chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID34107142
PMCPMC8369121
OpenAlexW3172580560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.