Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107138›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2021

Disrupting the medial prefrontal cortex with designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drug alters hippocampal sharp-wave ripples and their associated cognitive processes.

Brandy Schmidt, A David Redish

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prefrontal Default Mode Network Interactions with Posterior Hippocampus during Exploration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandy SchmidtDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7755-1722
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-9072
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR01MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$3.7M
The covert expectation of reward during deliberationR01DA030672 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR56MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2014 to 2015
$747k
Integrating Hippocampus, Ventral Striatum, and Prefrontal Cortex during Deliberative Decision MakingF32DA038392 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SCHMIDT, BRANDY J · 2015 to 2016
$116k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA038392NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030672NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080318NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH080318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) interact during a myriad of cognitive processes including decision-making and long-term memory consolidation. Exactly how the mPFC and hippocampus interact during goal-directed decision-making remains to be fully elucidated. During periods of rest, bursts of high-frequency oscillations, termed sharp-wave ripple (SWR), appear in the local field potential. Impairing SWRs on the maze or during post-learning rest can interfere with memory-guided decision-making and memory consolidation. We hypothesize that the hippocampus and mPFC bidirectionally interact during SWRs to support memory consolidation and decision-making. Rats were trained on the neuroeconomic spatial decision-making task, Restaurant Row, to make serial stay-skip decisions where the amount of effort (delay to reward) varied upon entry to each restaurant. Hippocampal cells and SWRs were recorded in rats with the mPFC transduced with inhibitory DREADDs. We found that disrupting the mPFC impaired consolidating SWRs in the hippocampus. Hippocampal SWR rates depended on the internalized value of the reward (derived from individual flavor preferences), a parameter important in decision-making, and disrupting the mPFC changed this relationship. Additionally, we found a dissociation between SWRs that occurred while rats were on the maze dependent upon whether those SWRs occurred while the rat was anticipating food reward or during post-reward consumption.

Indexed as

Designer DrugsMemory ConsolidationAnimalsCognitionHippocampusPrefrontal CortexRatsDesigner Drugsconsolidationdecision-makingforagingneuroeconomicRestaurant Rowspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID34107138
PMCPMC9590403
OpenAlexW3167947692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.