Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106976›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Is SF-12 a valid and reliable measurement of health-related quality of life among adults with Marfan syndrome? A confirmatory study.

Nathasha Udugampolage, Rosario Caruso, Mariangela Panetta, Edward Callus, Federica Dellafiore, Arianna Magon, Susan Marelli, Alessandro Pini

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07391293 (Genetic Aortic Diseases and Cardiovascular Complications. An Observational Survey of Risk Factors.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07391293 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Genetic Aortic Diseases and Cardiovascular Complications. An Observational Survey of Risk Factors.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoRan2025 to 2027Enrolled208ConditionsThoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA)ArmsJourney to diagnosis, Quality of life, functional health and well-being, Awareness and self-esteem, acceptance of the condition, psychological and physical well-being
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathasha UdugampolageCardiovascular-Genetic Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-6209
Mariangela PanettaCardiovascular-Genetic Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Edward CallusClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9286-1825
Federica DellafioreHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Arianna MagonHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-6940
Susan MarelliCardiovascular-Genetic Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Alessandro PiniCardiovascular-Genetic Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe structural validity and reliability of the Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) has not yet been tested in adults with the Marfan syndrome (MFS). This gap could undermine an evidence-grounded practice and research, especially considering that the need to assess health-related quality of life in patients with MFS has increased due to the improved life expectancy of these patients and the need to identify their determinants of quality of life. For this reason, this study aimed to confirm the dimensionality (structural validity) of the SF-12, its concurrent validity, and its reliability (internal consistency).

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of 111 Italian adults with MFS, collecting anamnestic and socio-demographic information, the SF-12, and short-form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify whether the items of SF-12 related to physical restrictions, physical functioning, and bodily pain were retained by the physical summary component of the SF-12. The items referred to the role limitations due to emotional issues, social functioning, and mental health were retained by the mental summary component (MCS12). SF-36 was used to assess the concurrent validity of SF-12, hypothesizing positive correlations among the equivalent summary scores.

resultsThe two-factor structural solution resulted in fitting the sample statistics adequately. The internal consistency was adequate for the two factors. Furthermore, the physical and mental summary scores of the SF-36 were positively correlated with their equivalent summary scores derived from the SF-12.

conclusionsThis study confirmed the factor structure of the SF-12. Therefore, the use of SF-12 in clinical practice and research for assessing the health-related quality of life among adults with MFS is evidence-grounded. Future research is recommended to determine whether the SF-12 shows measurement invariance in different national contexts and determine eventual demographic variation in the SF-12 scores among patients with MFS.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth StatusHealth SurveysHumansMaleMarfan SyndromePsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34106976
PMCPMC8189474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.