Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A novel Filobacterium sp can cause chronic bronchitis in cats.

Martina Načeradská, Sona Pekova, Patrizia Danesi, Tommaso Furlanello, Roberta Calleo, Patricia Martin, Fumio Ike, Richard Malik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Martina NačeradskáDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-7060
Sona PekovaTilia Laboratories, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnostics, Pchery, Czech Republic.
Patrizia DanesiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro (PD), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6738-2125
Tommaso FurlanelloSan Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Veggiano, Italy.
Roberta CalleoSan Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Veggiano, Italy.
Patricia MartinVeterinary Pathology Diagnostic Services, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fumio IkeExperimental Animal Division, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Richard MalikCentre for Veterinary Education, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUVeterinary Oncological Center · ITCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITRIKEN BioResource Research Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCilia-associated respiratory bacillus (CARB; now known as Filobacterium rodentium gen. nov., sp. nov.) is a primary pathogen of rodents. A CARB-like organism was reported in post-mortem lung samples of cats using light and electron microscopy. Here we explore by molecular procedures if a Filobacterium sp. is a part of the normal feline lower respiratory microbiome and whether it could in some cats contribute to the development of chronic bronchial disease. METHODOLOGY: A Filobacterium sp. was identified in three Czech cats clinically diagnosed as having chronic neutrophilic bronchitis. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens obtained from these cats were subjected to panbacterial 16S rDNA PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the V5 to V8 region. After these cats were treated with specific antimicrobials, their clinical signs resolved promptly, without recurrence. Next, BALF specimens from 13 Australian and 11 Italian cats with lower respiratory disease and an additional 16 lung samples of Italian cats who died of various causes were examined using next generation sequencing (NGS). Subsequently, a Filobacterium-specific qPCR assay was developed and used to re-test BALF specimens from the 11 Italian cats and lung tissue homogenates from the additional 16 deceased cats. PRINCIPAL

findingsAn amplicon of 548 bp with 91.24% sequence agreement with Filobacterium rodentium was obtained from all three patients, suggesting the novel Filobacterium sp. was the cause of their lower respiratory disease. The novel Filobacterium sp., which we propose to call F. felis, was detected in 3/3 Czech cats with chronic neutrophilic bronchitis, 13/13 Australian cats and 6/11 Italian cats with chronic lower respiratory disease, and 14/16 necropsy lung specimens from Italian cats. NGS and qPCR results all showed identical sequences. The Filobacterium sp. was sometimes the preponderant bacterial species in BALF specimens from cats with lower airway disease. There was an association between the presence of large numbers (greater than 105 organisms/mL) of Filobacterium and the presence of neutrophilic and/or histiocytic inflammation, although only a subset of inflammatory BALF specimens had F. felis as the preponderant organism.

conclusionThe novel Filobacterium sp. comprises a finite part of the normal feline lower respiratory microbiome. Under certain circumstances it can increase in absolute and relative abundance and give rise to neutrophilic and/or histiocytic bronchitis, bronchiolitis and bronchopneumonia. These findings strongly suggest that F. felis could be an underdiagnosed cause of feline bronchial disease.

Indexed as

BacteroidetesAnimalsBronchitis, ChronicCat DiseasesCatsCzech RepublicFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsLungMalePhylogenyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34106938
PMCPMC8189514
OpenAlexW3166547051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.