ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Expectancy-based rhythmic entrainment as continuous Bayesian inference.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulated field potentials capture multiple simultaneous processes underlying human temporal attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Modeling human synchronization to rhythmic patterns with varying statistical regularities.Acta psychologica · 2026Article
- Timing-induced illusory percepts of pitch.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of delay and amplification of auditory feedback for walking: anticipation, variability, and frequency adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neural representation of the musical beat is facilitated but not contingent on the repetition of rhythmic patterns.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of rhythmic expectations: Perspectives, pitfalls, and prospects.PLoS computational biology · 2025Review
- Pitch biases sensorimotor synchronization to auditory rhythms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Measuring self-similarity in empirical signals to understand musical beat perception.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Rats synchronize predictively to metronomes.iScience · 2024Article
- Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Coordinates Contextual Mental Imagery for Single-Beat Manipulation during Rhythmic Sensorimotor Synchronization.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Neural dynamics of predictive timing and motor engagement in music listening.Science advances · 2024Article
- Probing Beat Perception with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) in Human Adults, Newborns, and Nonhuman Primates.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- What is a Rhythm for the Brain? The Impact of Contextual Temporal Variability on Auditory Perception.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Do we all synch alike? Brain-body-environment interactions in ASD.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Article
- Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Review
- Testing beat perception without sensory cues to the beat: the Beat-Drop Alignment Test (BDAT).Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Modeling enculturated bias in entrainment to rhythmic patterns.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Neural Entrainment to Auditory Rhythms: Automatic or Top-Down Driven?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- The sweet spot between predictability and surprise: musical groove in brain, body, and social interactions.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When presented with complex rhythmic auditory stimuli, humans are able to track underlying temporal structure (e.g., a "beat"), both covertly and with their movements. This capacity goes far beyond that of a simple entrained oscillator, drawing on contextual and enculturated timing expectations and adjusting rapidly to perturbations in event timing, phase, and tempo. Previous modeling work has described how entrainment to rhythms may be shaped by event timing expectations, but sheds little light on any underlying computational principles that could unify the phenomenon of expectation-based entrainment with other brain processes. Inspired by the predictive processing framework, we propose that the problem of rhythm tracking is naturally characterized as a problem of continuously estimating an underlying phase and tempo based on precise event times and their correspondence to timing expectations. We present two inference problems formalizing this insight: PIPPET (Phase Inference from Point Process Event Timing) and PATIPPET (Phase and Tempo Inference). Variational solutions to these inference problems resemble previous "Dynamic Attending" models of perceptual entrainment, but introduce new terms representing the dynamics of uncertainty and the influence of expectations in the absence of sensory events. These terms allow us to model multiple characteristics of covert and motor human rhythm tracking not addressed by other models, including sensitivity of error corrections to inter-event interval and perceived tempo changes induced by event omissions. We show that positing these novel influences in human entrainment yields a range of testable behavioral predictions. Guided by recent neurophysiological observations, we attempt to align the phase inference framework with a specific brain implementation. We also explore the potential of this normative framework to guide the interpretation of experimental data and serve as building blocks for even richer predictive processing and active inference models of timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.