ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021
Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The physiological sonographic features of the ovary in healthy subjects: a joint systematic review and meta-analysis by the Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE).Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Investigation of multimodal deep learning models for predicting ovarian tumor malignancy based on ultrasound images and clinical information - a comprehensive comparative study against readers and O-RADS.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Serous Papillary Adenofibroma Cyst of the Ovary in a Young Woman: Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Diffusion-weighted imaging-based radiomics in epithelial ovarian tumors: Assessment of histologic subtype.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Value of Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current review sums up the literature on the diagnostic performance of models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses and the ability of ultrasound to make a specific diagnosis in adnexal masses. A summary of the role of ultrasound in assessing the extension of malignant ovarian disease is also provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.