Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106663›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Type 2 diabetes and the risk of colorectal polyps: A retrospective nationwide population-based study.

Po-Ke Hsu, Jing-Yang Huang, Wei-Wen Su, James Cheng-Chung Wei

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors Associated with Colorectal Polyps in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Po-Ke HsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua.
Jing-Yang HuangInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wei-Wen SuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua.
James Cheng-Chung WeiInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe incidence rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and colorectal polyps have been increasing over the last decades. However, direct associations between T2DM and colorectal polyps have not been extensively reported. We will explore the relationship between T2DM and colorectal polyps.In the retrospective study, we classified DM and NonDM groups (control) from 993,516 people in Taiwan nationwide population insurance database from the period of 2000 to 2013. We collected data on income and comorbidities through the international classification of diseases, ninth revision-clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes.The T2DM group had a higher incidence rate of colorectal polyps (31.97%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.97-33.28) than the control group (25.9%, 95% CI = 25.1-26.72), and the crude incidence ratio was 1.235 (95% CI = 1.174-1.300). In 13 years of follow-up (2000-2013), T2DM was linked to a significantly higher cumulative probability of colorectal polyps (log-rank test: P = .0001).Patients with T2DM had a 1.23-fold higher risk of new colorectal polyps than control patients in 13 years of follow-up. We explain the T2DM increases incidence for colorectal polyps in long term follow-up.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColonic PolypsComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID34106663
PMCPMC8133214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.