Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106660›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.

Hyun Young Kim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Numbers matter: How pediatric endoscopy quality varies with annual procedural volume.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Effect of Body Mass Index on Cecal Intubation Time During Unsedated Colonoscopy: Variation Across the Learning Stages of an Endoscopist.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Strategies to manage the difficult colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  8. Negative effect of prolonged cecal intubation time on adenoma detection in female patients.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic Yields and Clinical Impacts of Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyun Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-6022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe time required to intubate the cecum varies. The aim of this study was to determine whether demographic and anthropometric factors, such as body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, muscle mass, and fat mass, affect the cecal intubation time (CIT) during complete colonoscopy.A retrospective chart review of 1229 patients (aged 40-80 years) was performed. These patients underwent average-risk screening colonoscopies performed by expert gastroenterologists at Health Check-up Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, during a health check-up. We collected data on age, sex, BMI, percent body fat, muscle mass, fat mass, history of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery, CIT, and bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score).Of the 1229 patients, 62% were men. The mean age was 55 years, and the mean BMI was 24 kg/m2. The median CIT was 5 min. The patients were categorized into two groups according to CIT: easy colonoscopy (CIT ≤ 10 min) and difficult colonoscopy (CIT > 10 min). In univariate analysis, CIT was prolonged by the following factors: older age, poor bowel preparation, lower BMI, lower percent body fat, and less fat mass. Multivariate analysis showed that anthropometric indices including BMI, percent body fat, muscle mass, and fat mass were not significant factors for CIT. Older age (≥ 70 years) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.272, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.056-4.890, P = .036) and poor bowel preparation (BBPS score ≤ 5) (OR: 3.817, 95% CI: 1.866-7.808, P = .000) were found to be correlated with difficult colonoscopy.Our study suggests that anthropometric indices including BMI, percent body fat, muscle mass, and fat mass are not associated with significantly different CIT. Furthermore, sex and prior abdominal or pelvic surgery are not useful factors for a prolonged CIT. Older age (≥ 70 years) and poor bowel preparation (BBPS score ≤ 5) are significant variables predicting the CIT of expert gastroenterologists.

Indexed as

CecumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBody CompositionBody Mass IndexBody Weights and MeasuresColonoscopyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID34106660
PMCPMC8133265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.