ArticleMedicine2021
Effects of 45° prone position ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial study.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Histone Deacetylases in Acute Lung Injury-Friend or Foe.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an increasingly common acute respiratory failure that seriously threaten people's health. ARDS has a case fatality rate of up to 40%. ARDS is a serious threat to the life safety of patients and the quality of life, causing a huge economic burden to individuals, families and society. ARDS has become a large worldwide public health problem. Prone position ventilation (PPV) is an important auxiliary treatment for ARDS, which could improve oxygenation. However, PPV could cause Pressure injuries (PI) and other complications easily. We found that 45° PPV could reduce the incidence of PI, but lack of robust Evidence-based medicine evidence proving its efficacy. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of 45° PPV in the treatment of ARDS.
methodsA total of 268 patients will be randomly assigned to the control group and the test group (n = 134 each) in a ratio of 1:1. The treatment period is 7 days. The primary outcome measure will be the incidence of PI. The secondary outcomes will include APACHE II score, Braden Scale score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, pH of arterial blood, oxygenation index, oxygen partial pressure, and carbon dioxide partial pressure. The evaluation will be performed at baseline, 1 hour, 12 hour, 48 hour, 5days, 7days after PPPV.
resultsThis study is helpful to evaluate the efficacy of 45° PPV in the treatment of ARDS.
conclusion45° PPV may reduce the incidence of PI and improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, which has important value in practical application.
trial registrationChiCTR2000040436, registration time: November 28, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.