Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106416›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2021

Phenomenological and existential contributions to the study of erectile dysfunction.

Chris A Suijker, Corijn van Mazijk, Fred A Keijzer, Boaz Meijer

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Kidney stone disease: phenomenological perspectives.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  3. Pain and temporality: a merleau-pontyian approach.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024
    Article
  4. Foucault and medicine: challenging normative claims.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris A SuijkerDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.a.suijker@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0715-2376
Corijn van MazijkFaculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fred A KeijzerFaculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Boaz MeijerDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current medical approach to erectile dysfunction (ED) consists of physiological, psychological and social components. This paper proposes an additional framework for thinking about ED based on phenomenology, by focusing on the theory of sexual projection. This framework will be complementary to the current medical approach to ED. Our phenomenological analysis of ED provides philosophical depth and illuminates overlooked aspects in the study of ED. Mainly by appealing to Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception, we suggest considering an additional etiology of ED in terms of a weakening of a function of sexual projection. We argue that sexual projection can be problematized through cognitive interferences, changes in the 'intentional arc', and modifications in the subject's 'body schema'. Our approach further highlights the importance of considering the 'existential situation' of patients with ED. We close by reflecting briefly on some of the implications of this phenomenological framework for diagnosis and treatment of ED.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionBody ImageExistentialismHumansMaleBody schemaErectile dysfunctionExistentialismMerleau-PontyPerceptionPhenomenology

Identifiers

PMID34106416
PMCPMC8557142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.