Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34106360›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2022

Racial and Ethnic Differences in E-Cigarette and Cigarette Use Among Adolescents.

Young S Seo, Yu-Ping Chang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating changes in vape use among Canadian youth from 2014 to 2022.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Young S SeoHealth Behavior Department, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. youngsik@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-4762
Yu-Ping ChangSchool of Nursing, The State University of New York at Buffalo, 3435 Main Street Wende Hall 101C, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined whether e-cigarette/cigarette use status would differ by student race/ethnicity. Using the 2017 Youth risk behavior survey (YRBS), weighted Chi-square tests with Rao-Scott adjustments and adjusted weighted multinomial logistic regression analysis were conducted to examine the relationship. Weighted Chi-square tests showed that American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students had the highest prevalence rates among dual users (16.2%) and e-cigarette only users (11.3%), while White peers had the highest prevalence rates among cigarette only users (3.5%). The results of weighted multinomial logistic regression indicated that AI/AN students had higher odds than White peers of being dual users (Relative risk ratio (RRR), 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01, 4.39), while Black, Hispanic, Asian and multi-racial groups had lower odds than White peers of being dual users. Additionally, Asian students had lower odds than White students of being e-cigarette only users, whereas Black and Asian students had lower odds than their White peers of being cigarette only users. Given that AI/AN students are most vulnerable to e-cigarette/cigarette use, there should be comprehensive tobacco prevention and intervention approaches that could narrow racial/ethnic differences among both youths and adults at population level.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultEthnicityHumansRacial GroupsCigaretteDual usersE-cigaretteRacial/Ethnic differencesVaping

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.