ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
APC germline variant analysis in the adenomatous polyposis phenotype in Japanese patients.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Genomic mosaicism in colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular Analysis of Biliary Tract Neoplasms Associated with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- ExploringJCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling for the germline pathogenic variant of the APC gene in patients with adenomatous polyposis: proposing a new APC score.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Early genetic events in the colorectal carcinogenic pathway of familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic polyp: germline and somatic alterations in carcinogenesis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Implications of Genomic Medicine and Precision Oncology.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025Review
- Re-evaluating the genotypes of patients with adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology: a nationwide study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Genomic insights into familial adenomatous polyposis: unraveling a rare case with whole APC gene deletion and intellectual disability.Human genome variation · 2024Article
- Usefulness of genotyping APC gene for individualizing management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Monoallelic deleterious MUTYH mutations generate colorectal cancer: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Development of a prognostic model for children with neuroblastoma based on necroptosis-related genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A Case of Lamina Lucida-Type Linear IgA Disease Complicated by Colon Polyposis and Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Case reports in dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple colonic polyps, is caused by a germline pathogenic variant of the APC gene. However, this variant is not detected in up to 30% of patients with the adenomatous polyposis phenotype.
methodsWe performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify the causative genes in FAP patients with 10 or more polyps. For patients in whom the APC germline variant was not able to be identified, we screened for APC mosaicism using high-coverage NGS of APC with DNA from leucocytes and/or frozen tissue.
resultsThe pathogenic APC germline variant was found in 93.3%, 71.6%, and 17.1% of patients with profuse-type polyposis, sparse-type polyposis, and oligo-polyposis, respectively. The APC germline variant detection rate in patients with FAP-related diseases was 69.7% for fundic gland polyposis, 79.7% for duodenal adenoma, 94.7% for desmoid tumor, and 71.4% for thyroid cancer, with increasing numbers of extracolonic lesions associated with an increasing APC germline variant detection rate. A mosaic test detected nine patients with APC mosaicism. A comparison of APC-associated polyposis with APC mosaicism showed that patients with APC mosaicism had a low frequency of duodenal adenoma and a family history of colonic polyposis.
conclusionsWe determined the detection rate of the APC germline variant by phenotype and identified APC mosaicism. Genetic testing of FAP patients is important because it can help with surgical decision-making, monitoring, and genetic counseling. Furthermore, genetic testing by NGS proved to be an effective method of detecting APC germline variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.